173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21816731)
1. Radiation protection of staff in 111In radionuclide therapy--is the lead apron shielding effective?
Lyra M; Charalambatou P; Sotiropoulos M; Diamantopoulos S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):272-6. PubMed ID: 21816731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Optimizing staff radiation protection in radiology by minimizing the effective dose].
von Boetticher H; Lachmund J; Hoffmann W; Luska G
Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 16508835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does the lead apron and collar always reduce radiation dose?
Nortje CJ; Harris AM; Lackovic KP; Wood RE
SADJ; 2001 Nov; 56(11):502-4. PubMed ID: 11885424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of dose savings of lead and lightweight aprons for shielding of 99m-Technetium radiation.
Warren-Forward H; Cardew P; Smith B; Clack L; McWhirter K; Johnson S; Wessel K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 124(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17525062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dose rates in nuclear medicine and the effectiveness of lead aprons: updating the department's knowledge on old and new procedures.
Young AM
Nucl Med Commun; 2013 Mar; 34(3):254-64. PubMed ID: 23353888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Protection of eye lens in computed tomography--dose evaluation on an anthropomorphic phantom using thermo-luminescent dosimeters and Monte-Carlo simulations].
Keil B; Wulff J; Schmitt R; Auvanis D; Danova D; Heverhagen JT; Fiebich M; Madsack B; Leppek R; Klose KJ; Zink K
Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1047-53. PubMed ID: 19235699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of lead apron shielding on absorbed doses from panoramic radiography.
Rottke D; Grossekettler L; Sawada K; Poxleitner P; Schulze D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130302. PubMed ID: 24404601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radio-protective aprons during radiological examinations of the thorax: an optimum strategy.
Jackson G; Brennan PC
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):391-4. PubMed ID: 16782981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experimental simulation of personal dosimetry in production of medical radioisotopes by research reactor.
Mossadegh N; Karimian A; Shahhosseini E; Mohammadzadeh A; Sheibani Sh
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):267-71. PubMed ID: 21862507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of neutron and photon response of a TLD-ALBEDO personal dosemeter on an ISO slab phantom using TRIPOLI-4.3 Monte Carlo code.
Lee YK
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):329-33. PubMed ID: 16381740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [How conservative is routine personal dosimetry monitoring in diagnostic radiology?].
von Boetticher H; Lachmund J; Hoffmann W
Rofo; 2007 Jul; 179(7):728-32. PubMed ID: 17657704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of double dosimetry algorithms for estimating the effective dose in occupational dosimetry of interventional radiology staff.
Järvinen H; Buls N; Clerinx P; Miljanic S; Nikodemová D; Ranogajec-Komor M; Struelens L; d'Errico F
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 18757899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Absorbed radiation dose of the female breast during diagnostic multidetector chest CT and dose reduction with a tungsten-antimony composite breast shield: preliminary results.
Parker MS; Kelleher NM; Hoots JA; Chung JK; Fatouros PP; Benedict SH
Clin Radiol; 2008 Mar; 63(3):278-88. PubMed ID: 18275868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of shielding in superficial X-ray therapy.
Medvedevas N; Adliene D; Laurikaitiene J; Andrejaitis A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):291-5. PubMed ID: 21816725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating effective dose for a cardiac catheterisation procedure with single or double personal dosemeters.
Schultz FW; Zoetelief J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 118(2):196-204. PubMed ID: 16517567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Double-dosimetry algorithm for workers in interventional radiology.
Clerinx P; Buls N; Bosmans H; de Mey J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):321-7. PubMed ID: 18426849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of lead apron shielding on absorbed doses from panoramic radiography.
Rottke D; Grossekettler L; Sawada K; Poxleitner P; Schulze D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130302. PubMed ID: 24174012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult computed tomography examinations: can we estimate organ and effective dose from mean MAS reduction?
Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Oikonomou I; Damilakis J
Invest Radiol; 2011 Oct; 46(10):654-62. PubMed ID: 21673583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of a suspended radiation protection system versus standard lead apron for radiation exposure of a simulated interventionalist.
Marichal DA; Anwar T; Kirsch D; Clements J; Carlson L; Savage C; Rees CR
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2011 Apr; 22(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 21354818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
