These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2181736)

  • 1. A review of the Buehler guinea pig skin sensitization test and its use in a risk assessment process for human skin sensitization.
    Robinson MK; Nusair TL; Fletcher ER; Ritz HL
    Toxicology; 1990 Apr; 61(2):91-107. PubMed ID: 2181736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A risk assessment process for allergic contact sensitization.
    Robinson MK; Stotts J; Danneman PJ; Nusair TL; Bay PH
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1989 Jul; 27(7):479-89. PubMed ID: 2673957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment.
    Kimber I; Basketter DA; Berthold K; Butler M; Garrigue JL; Lea L; Newsome C; Roggeband R; Steiling W; Stropp G; Waterman S; Wiemann C
    Toxicol Sci; 2001 Feb; 59(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 11158712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative study of the sensitivity of the 3-induction and 9-induction Buehler test procedures for assessing skin sensitisation potential.
    Botham P; Urtizberea M; Wiemann C; Manciaux X; Tilbury L; Vohr HW; Allen S; Carmichael NG; de Jouffrey S
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2005 Jan; 43(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 15582197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preclinical skin sensitization testing of antihistamines: guinea pig and local lymph node assay responses.
    Robinson MK; Cruze CA
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1996 May; 34(5):495-506. PubMed ID: 8655100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the sensitivities of the Buehler test and the guinea pig maximization test for predictive testing of contact allergy.
    Frankild S; Vølund A; Wahlberg JE; Andersen KE
    Acta Derm Venereol; 2000; 80(4):256-62. PubMed ID: 11028857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of contact allergens using the murine local lymph node assay: comparisons with the Buehler occluded patch test in guinea pigs.
    Kimber I; Hilton J; Botham PA
    J Appl Toxicol; 1990 Jun; 10(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 2380478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Value of the cutaneous basophil hypersensitivity (CBH) response for distinguishing weak contact sensitization from irritation reactions in the guinea pig.
    Robinson MK; Fletcher ER; Johnson GR; Wyder WE; Maurer JK
    J Invest Dermatol; 1990 May; 94(5):636-43. PubMed ID: 2324519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of guinea pig sensitization methods.
    Fahr H; Noster U; Schulz KH
    Contact Dermatitis; 1976 Dec; 2(6):335-9. PubMed ID: 1032127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Information derived from sensitization test methods: test sensitivity, false positives and false negatives.
    Basketter DA; Kimber I
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Jan; 56(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 17177701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrospective appraisal of the relationship between skin irritancy and contact sensitization potential.
    Auton TR; Botham PA; Kimber I
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1995 Oct; 46(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 7563214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Guinea pig sensitization assays: an experimental comparison of three methods.
    Modjtahedi BS; Fortenbach CR; Marsano JG; Gandhi AM; Staab R; Maibach HI
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2011 Jun; 30(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 21265706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The noninvasive mouse ear swelling assay. II. Testing the contact sensitizing potency of fragrances.
    Thorne PS; Hawk C; Kaliszewski SD; Guiney PD
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1991 Nov; 17(4):807-20. PubMed ID: 1778366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Skin sensitization--a critical review of predictive test methods in animals and man.
    Botham PA; Basketter DA; Maurer T; Mueller D; Potokar M; Bontinck WJ
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1991 Apr; 29(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 2040490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental nickel sensitization in the guinea pig: comparison of different protocols.
    Lammintausta K; Kalimo K; Jansén CT
    Contact Dermatitis; 1985 May; 12(5):258-62. PubMed ID: 4028701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A quantitative comparison of induction and challenge concentrations inducing a 50% positive response in three skin sensitization tests; the guinea pig maximization test, adjuvant and patch test and Buehler test.
    Nakamura Y; Higaki T; Kato H; Kishida F; Kogiso S; Isobe N; Kaneko H
    J Toxicol Sci; 1999 May; 24(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 10349614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Results with OECD recommended positive control sensitizers in the maximization, Buehler and local lymph node assays.
    Basketter DA; Selbie E; Scholes EW; Lees D; Kimber I; Botham PA
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1993 Jan; 31(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 8444389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk assessment of sensitizing agents.
    Gerberick GF
    Arch Toxicol Suppl; 1994; 16():95-101. PubMed ID: 8192601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Guinea pigs in hypersensitivity testing.
    Maurer T
    Methods; 2007 Jan; 41(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 17161301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Recent development in animal testing to predict the skin and respiratory sensitizing potential of chemicals].
    Aoyama K
    Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2010 Jan; 65(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 20134104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.