These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Cantilever dynamics and quality factor control in AC mode AFM height measurements. Chen L; Yu X; Wang D Ultramicroscopy; 2007; 107(4-5):275-80. PubMed ID: 17157439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. High-resolution and large dynamic range nanomechanical mapping in tapping-mode atomic force microscopy. Sahin O; Erina N Nanotechnology; 2008 Nov; 19(44):445717. PubMed ID: 21832758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of solution concentration, surface bias and protonation on the dynamic response of amplitude-modulated atomic force microscopy in water. Wu Y; Gupta C; Shannon MA Langmuir; 2008 Oct; 24(19):10817-24. PubMed ID: 18763814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Application of triangular atomic force microscopy cantilevers to friction measurement with the improved parallel scan method. Wang YL; Zhao XZ Rev Sci Instrum; 2009 Feb; 80(2):023704. PubMed ID: 19256650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. High-speed atomic force microscope imaging: adaptive multiloop mode. Ren J; Zou Q; Li B; Lin Z Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2014 Jul; 90(1):012405. PubMed ID: 25122313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. State feedback control for adjusting the dynamic behavior of a piezoactuated bimorph atomic force microscopy probe. Orun B; Necipoglu S; Basdogan C; Guvenc L Rev Sci Instrum; 2009 Jun; 80(6):063701. PubMed ID: 19566204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Micro-wilhelmy and related liquid property measurements using constant-diameter nanoneedle-tipped atomic force microscope probes. Yazdanpanah MM; Hosseini M; Pabba S; Berry SM; Dobrokhotov VV; Safir A; Keynton RS; Cohn RW Langmuir; 2008 Dec; 24(23):13753-64. PubMed ID: 18986184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Characterization of surface stiffness and probe-sample dissipation using the band excitation method of atomic force microscopy: a numerical analysis. Kareem AU; Solares SD Nanotechnology; 2012 Jan; 23(1):015706. PubMed ID: 22155951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Measurement sensitivity improvement in tapping-mode atomic force microscopy through bi-harmonic drive signal. Loganathan M; Kodandarama SR; Bristow DA Rev Sci Instrum; 2011 Oct; 82(10):103704. PubMed ID: 22047300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reconstruction of a scanned topographic image distorted by the creep effect of a Z scanner in atomic force microscopy. Han C; Chung CC Rev Sci Instrum; 2011 May; 82(5):053709. PubMed ID: 21639509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Influence of the tip mass on the tip-sample interactions in TM-AFM. Pishkenari HN; Meghdari A Ultramicroscopy; 2011 Jul; 111(8):1423-36. PubMed ID: 21864786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Control of the higher eigenmodes of a microcantilever: applications in atomic force microscopy. Karvinen KS; Moheimani SO Ultramicroscopy; 2014 Feb; 137():66-71. PubMed ID: 24361530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Sensorless enhancement of an atomic force microscope micro-cantilever quality factor using piezoelectric shunt control. Fairbairn M; Moheimani SO Rev Sci Instrum; 2013 May; 84(5):053706. PubMed ID: 23742557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. High-speed dynamic atomic force microscopy by using a Q-controlled cantilever eigenmode as an actuator. Balantekin M Ultramicroscopy; 2015 Feb; 149():45-50. PubMed ID: 25436928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Current measurements in the intermittent-contact mode of atomic force microscopy using the Fourier method: a feasibility analysis. Uluutku B; Solares SD Beilstein J Nanotechnol; 2020; 11():453-465. PubMed ID: 32215233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]