98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21817904)
41. [Genetic analysis of a family with super-male syndrome].
Zhang J; Li H; Jiang S; Chen Y; Zhang Y
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Apr; 31(2):210-3. PubMed ID: 24711034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction for the verification of genomic imbalances detected by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization.
Yu S; Kielt M; Stegner AL; Kibiryeva N; Bittel DC; Cooley LD
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2009 Dec; 13(6):751-60. PubMed ID: 20001581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparing two diagnostic laboratory tests for Williams syndrome: fluorescent in situ hybridization versus multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.
van Hagen JM; Eussen HJ; van Schooten R; van Der Geest JN; Lagers-van Haselen GC; Wouters CH; De Zeeuw CI; Gille JJ
Genet Test; 2007; 11(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 17949295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Multiplex quantitative foodborne pathogen detection using high resolution CE-SSCP coupled stuffer-free multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.
Chung B; Shin GW; Na J; Oh MH; Jung GY
Electrophoresis; 2012 May; 33(9-10):1477-81. PubMed ID: 22648818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification using a completely synthetic probe set.
Stern RF; Roberts RG; Mann K; Yau SC; Berg J; Ogilvie CM
Biotechniques; 2004 Sep; 37(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 15470894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Evaluation of multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification (MLPA) for identification of acute lymphoblastic leukemia with an intrachromosomal amplification of chromosome 21 (iAMP21) in a Brazilian population.
Fuka G; Farias-Vieira TM; Hummel L; Blunck CB; Santoro JC; Terra-Granado E; Barbosa TC; Emerenciano M; Pombo-de-Oliveira MS
Mol Cytogenet; 2015; 8():35. PubMed ID: 26060508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Detection, analysis and clinical validation of chromosomal aberrations by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification in chronic leukemia.
Abdool A; Donahue AC; Wohlgemuth JG; Yeh CH
PLoS One; 2010 Oct; 5(10):e15407. PubMed ID: 21049055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Quantitative PCR evaluation of deletions/duplications identified by array CGH.
Baldan F; Passon N; Burra S; Demori E; Russo PD; Damante G
Mol Cell Probes; 2019 Aug; 46():101421. PubMed ID: 31302230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Multiplex PCB-based electrochemical detection of cancer biomarkers using MLPA-barcode approach.
Sánchez JL; Henry OY; Joda H; Solnestam BW; Kvastad L; Johansson E; Akan P; Lundeberg J; Lladach N; Ramakrishnan D; Riley I; O'Sullivan CK
Biosens Bioelectron; 2016 Aug; 82():224-32. PubMed ID: 27085955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Detecting DNaseI-hypersensitivity sites with MLPA.
Ohnesorg T; Eggers S; White SJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 786():201-10. PubMed ID: 21938628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Development of a nonfluorescent multiplex semiquantitative polymerase chain reaction to confirm rearrangements detected by array-comparative genomic hybridization.
Huin V; Drouot N; Chambon P; Le Meur N; Frébourg T; Tosi M; Saugier-Veber P
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2011; 15(7-8):469-74. PubMed ID: 21413874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. MLPA for confirmation of array CGH results and determination of inheritance.
Hills A; Ahn JW; Donaghue C; Thomas H; Mann K; Ogilvie CM
Mol Cytogenet; 2010 Oct; 3():19. PubMed ID: 20942916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Detection limit of intragenic deletions with targeted array comparative genomic hybridization.
Askree SH; Chin EL; Bean LH; Coffee B; Tanner A; Hegde M
BMC Genet; 2013 Dec; 14():116. PubMed ID: 24304607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. MLPA analysis in a cohort of patients with autism.
Peixoto S; Melo JB; Ferrão J; Pires LM; Lavoura N; Pinto M; Oliveira G; Carreira IM
Mol Cytogenet; 2017; 10():2. PubMed ID: 28174603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. High-resolution genome-wide analysis of chromosomal alterations in elastofibroma.
Hernández JL; Rodríguez-Parets JO; Valero JM; Muñoz MA; Benito MR; Hernandez JM; Bullón A
Virchows Arch; 2010 Jun; 456(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 20422214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Human MLPA Probe Design (H-MAPD): a probe design tool for both electrophoresis-based and bead-coupled human multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification assays.
Zhi J; Hatchwell E
BMC Genomics; 2008 Sep; 9():407. PubMed ID: 18783624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Multiplex ligation-depending probe amplification is not suitable for detection of low-grade mosaicism.
van Veghel-Plandsoen MM; Wouters CH; Kromosoeto JN; den Ridder-Klünnen MC; Halley DJ; van den Ouweland AM
Eur J Hum Genet; 2011 Sep; 19(9):1009-12. PubMed ID: 21487440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Integrated Genomic Analysis of Chromosomal Alterations and Mutations in B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Reveals Distinct Genetic Profiles at Relapse.
Forero-Castro M; Montaño A; Robledo C; García de Coca A; Fuster JL; de Las Heras N; Queizán JA; Hernández-Sánchez M; Corchete-Sánchez LA; Martín-Izquierdo M; Ribera J; Ribera JM; Benito R; Hernández-Rivas JM
Diagnostics (Basel); 2020 Jul; 10(7):. PubMed ID: 32635531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. ProSeeK: a web server for MLPA probe design.
Pantano L; Armengol L; Villatoro S; Estivill X
BMC Genomics; 2008 Nov; 9():573. PubMed ID: 19040730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Submicroscopic copy-number variations associated with 46,XY disorders of sex development.
Kon M; Fukami M
Mol Cell Pediatr; 2015 Dec; 2(1):7. PubMed ID: 26542297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
