98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21817904)
61. Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Probe Validation for Clinical Use.
Gu J; Smith JL; Dowling PK
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1541():101-118. PubMed ID: 27910018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Gonosomal mosaicism for an NF1 deletion in a sperm donor: evidence of the need for coordinated, long-term communication of health information among relevant parties.
Callum P; Messiaen LM; Bower PV; Skovby F; Iger J; Timshel S; Sims CA; Falk RE
Hum Reprod; 2012 Apr; 27(4):1223-6. PubMed ID: 22328556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Microarray-Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization, Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification, and High-Resolution Karyotype for Differential Diagnosis Oculoauriculovertebral Spectrum: A Systematic Review.
Glaeser AB; Diniz BL; Deconte D; Santos AS; Rosa RFM; Zen PRG
J Pediatr Genet; 2020 Sep; 9(3):149-157. PubMed ID: 32714614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Screening of the copy number increase of
Minegishi K; Dobashi Y; Tsubochi H; Tokuda R; Okudela K; Ooi A
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2019; 12(9):3344-3356. PubMed ID: 31934177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Rapid high-throughput analysis of DNaseI hypersensitive sites using a modified Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification approach.
Ohnesorg T; Eggers S; Leonhard WN; Sinclair AH; White SJ
BMC Genomics; 2009 Sep; 10():412. PubMed ID: 19728890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Rapid and reliable determination of transgene zygosity in mice by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.
Notini AJ; Li R; Western PS; Sinclair AH; White SJ
Transgenic Res; 2009 Dec; 18(6):987-91. PubMed ID: 19504348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Identification of biomarkers for tuberculosis disease using a novel dual-color RT-MLPA assay.
Joosten SA; Goeman JJ; Sutherland JS; Opmeer L; de Boer KG; Jacobsen M; Kaufmann SH; Finos L; Magis-Escurra C; Ota MO; Ottenhoff TH; Haks MC
Genes Immun; 2012 Jan; 13(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 21956656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Risk assessment models in genetics clinic for array comparative genomic hybridization: Clinical information can be used to predict the likelihood of an abnormal result in patients.
Marano RM; Mercurio L; Kanter R; Doyle R; Abuelo D; Morrow EM; Shur N
J Pediatr Genet; 2013 Mar; 2(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 27625836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Evaluation of real-time quantitative PCR as a standard cytogenetic diagnostic tool for confirmation of microarray (aCGH) results and determination of inheritance.
Wang R; Carter J; Lench N
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2013 Nov; 17(11):821-5. PubMed ID: 24024523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Custom Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization: the Importance of DNA Quality, an Expert Eye, and Variant Validation.
Lantieri F; Malacarne M; Gimelli S; Santamaria G; Coviello D; Ceccherini I
Int J Mol Sci; 2017 Mar; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 28287439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Current Diagnostic Approaches in the Genetic Diagnosis of Disorders of Sex Development.
Özalp Kızılay D; Özen S
J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38683034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Comprehensive Genetic Evaluation of Bulgarian Children with Syndromic Craniosynostosis.
Delchev T; Hadjidekova S; Bichev S; Veleva T; Boneva I; Avdjieva-Tzavella D
Balkan J Med Genet; 2022 Jun; 25(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 36880037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Gene dosage analysis by multiplex amplifiable probe hybridization.
Armour JA; Rad IA; Hollox EJ; Akrami SM; Cross GS
Methods Mol Med; 2004; 92():125-39. PubMed ID: 14733310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. Improved molecular detection of mosaicism in Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome.
Baker SW; Duffy KA; Richards-Yutz J; Deardorff MA; Kalish JM; Ganguly A
J Med Genet; 2021 Mar; 58(3):178-184. PubMed ID: 32430359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Cytogenomic assessment of the diagnosis of 93 patients with developmental delay and multiple congenital abnormalities: The Brazilian experience.
Zanardo ÉA; Dutra RL; Piazzon FB; Dias AT; Novo-Filho GM; Nascimento AM; Montenegro MM; Damasceno JG; Madia FAR; da Costa TVMM; Melaragno MI; Kim CA; Kulikowski LD
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2017 Oct; 72(9):526-537. PubMed ID: 29069255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Validation of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification for confirmation of array comparative genomic hybridization.
Jennings LJ; Yu M; Fitzpatrick C; Smith FA
Diagn Mol Pathol; 2011 Sep; 20(3):166-74. PubMed ID: 21817904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Analysis of genomic alterations in neuroblastoma by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and array comparative genomic hybridization: a comparison of results.
Combaret V; Iacono I; Bréjon S; Schleiermacher G; Pierron G; Couturier J; Bergeron C; Blay JY
Cancer Genet; 2012 Dec; 205(12):657-64. PubMed ID: 23265803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Designing a simple multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assay for rapid detection of copy number variants in the genome.
Shen Y; Wu BL
J Genet Genomics; 2009 Apr; 36(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 19376486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Evaluation of MLPA for the detection of cryptic subtelomeric rearrangements.
Monfort S; Orellana C; Oltra S; Roselló M; Guitart M; Martínez F
J Lab Clin Med; 2006 Jun; 147(6):295-300. PubMed ID: 16750667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. [Utilization of MLPA to detection of genetic changes in neuroblastoma].
Vícha A; Eckschlager T
Klin Onkol; 2008; 21(4):149-53. PubMed ID: 19102220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
