BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21818364)

  • 1. Comparison of eight methods for the extraction of Bacillus atrophaeus spore DNA from eleven common interferents and a common swab.
    Rose HL; Dewey CA; Ely MS; Willoughby SL; Parsons TM; Cox V; Spencer PM; Weller SA
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(7):e22668. PubMed ID: 21818364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of five commercial nucleic acid extraction kits for their ability to inactivate Bacillus anthracis spores and comparison of DNA yields from spores and spiked environmental samples.
    Dauphin LA; Moser BD; Bowen MD
    J Microbiol Methods; 2009 Jan; 76(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18824041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of four commercial DNA extraction kits for the recovery of Bacillus spp. spore DNA from spiked powder samples.
    Mölsä M; Kalin-Mänttäri L; Tonteri E; Hemmilä H; Nikkari S
    J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Sep; 128():69-73. PubMed ID: 27435532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of five commercial DNA extraction kits for the recovery of Yersinia pestis DNA from bacterial suspensions and spiked environmental samples.
    Dauphin LA; Stephens KW; Eufinger SC; Bowen MD
    J Appl Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 108(1):163-72. PubMed ID: 19558466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of automated and manual commercial DNA extraction methods for recovery of Brucella DNA from suspensions and spiked swabs.
    Dauphin LA; Hutchins RJ; Bost LA; Bowen MD
    J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Dec; 47(12):3920-6. PubMed ID: 19846627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of DNA extraction methods for amplification by qPCR of superficial vs intracellular DNA from Bacillus spores.
    Brauge T; Faille C; Inglebert G; Dubois T; Morieux P; Slomianny C; Midelet-Bourdin G
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2018 Feb; 266():289-294. PubMed ID: 29274485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of nucleic acid extraction platforms for detection of select biothreat agents for use in clinical resource limited settings.
    Shipley MA; Koehler JW; Kulesh DA; Minogue TD
    J Microbiol Methods; 2012 Oct; 91(1):179-83. PubMed ID: 22750394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of commercial DNA extraction kits for the isolation of bacterial spore DNA from soil.
    Dineen SM; Aranda R; Anders DL; Robertson JM
    J Appl Microbiol; 2010 Dec; 109(6):1886-96. PubMed ID: 20666869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of DNA extraction methods for Bacillus anthracis spores isolated from spiked food samples.
    Thomas MC; Shields MJ; Hahn KR; Janzen TW; Goji N; Amoako KK
    J Appl Microbiol; 2013 Jul; 115(1):156-62. PubMed ID: 23560745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative evaluation of automated and manual commercial DNA extraction methods for detection of Francisella tularensis DNA from suspensions and spiked swabs by real-time polymerase chain reaction.
    Dauphin LA; Walker RE; Petersen JM; Bowen MD
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2011 Jul; 70(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 21546201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Internal control for nucleic acid testing based on the use of purified Bacillus atrophaeus subsp. globigii spores.
    Picard FJ; Gagnon M; Bernier MR; Parham NJ; Bastien M; Boissinot M; Peytavi R; Bergeron MG
    J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Mar; 47(3):751-7. PubMed ID: 19144808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of eleven commercial DNA extraction kits for real-time PCR detection of Bacillus anthracis spores in spiked dairy samples.
    Mertens K; Freund L; Schmoock G; Hänsel C; Melzer F; Elschner MC
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2014 Jan; 170():29-37. PubMed ID: 24291177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of seven commercial DNA extraction kits for the recovery of Brucella DNA from spiked human serum samples using real-time PCR.
    Queipo-Ortuño MI; Tena F; Colmenero JD; Morata P
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2008 Feb; 27(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 17973130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of commercial DNA extraction kits for isolation and purification of bacterial and eukaryotic DNA from PAH-contaminated soils.
    Mahmoudi N; Slater GF; Fulthorpe RR
    Can J Microbiol; 2011 Aug; 57(8):623-8. PubMed ID: 21815819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of five commercial DNA extraction kits for the recovery of Francisella tularensis DNA from spiked soil samples.
    Whitehouse CA; Hottel HE
    Mol Cell Probes; 2007 Apr; 21(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 17011748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of automated and manual DNA purification methods for detecting Ricinus communis DNA during ricin investigations.
    Hutchins AS; Astwood MJ; Saah JR; Michel PA; Newton BR; Dauphin LA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Mar; 236():10-5. PubMed ID: 24529769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of commercial DNA preparation kits for the detection of Brucellae in tissue using quantitative real-time PCR.
    Tomaso H; Kattar M; Eickhoff M; Wernery U; Al Dahouk S; Straube E; Neubauer H; Scholz HC
    BMC Infect Dis; 2010 Apr; 10():100. PubMed ID: 20403208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the Biological Sampling Kit (BiSKit) for large-area surface sampling.
    Buttner MP; Cruz P; Stetzenbach LD; Klima-Comba AK; Stevens VL; Emanuel PA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2004 Dec; 70(12):7040-5. PubMed ID: 15574898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of seven methods for extraction of bacterial DNA from fecal and cecal samples of mice.
    Ferrand J; Patron K; Legrand-Frossi C; Frippiat JP; Merlin C; Alauzet C; Lozniewski A
    J Microbiol Methods; 2014 Oct; 105():180-5. PubMed ID: 25093756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a modified rapid viability-polymerase chain reaction method for Bacillus atrophaeus spores in water matrices.
    Bushon RN; Brady AMG; Kephart CM; Gallardo V
    J Microbiol Methods; 2021 Sep; 188():106293. PubMed ID: 34324928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.