These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21818575)

  • 1. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy/sacrocervicopexy repair of pelvic organ prolapse: initial experience.
    Göçmen A; Sanlıkan F; Uçar MG
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Mar; 285(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 21818575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Turkey's experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: a series of 25 consecutive cases.
    Göçmen A; Sanlikan F; Uçar MG
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Aug; 282(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 19838722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic approaches to prolapse surgery.
    Rosenblum N
    Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Jul; 22(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 22647648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Judd JP; Siddiqui NY; Barnett JC; Visco AG; Havrilesky LJ; Wu JM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20621010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term outcomes after robotic sacrocolpopexy in pelvic organ prolapse: prospective analysis.
    Moreno Sierra J; Ortiz Oshiro E; Fernandez Pérez C; Galante Romo I; Corral Rosillo J; Prieto Nogal S; Castillon Vela IT; Silmi Moyano A; Alvarez Fernandez-Represa J
    Urol Int; 2011; 86(4):414-8. PubMed ID: 21346319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes.
    Geller EJ; Parnell BA; Dunivan GC
    Urology; 2012 Mar; 79(3):532-6. PubMed ID: 22386392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Robotic-assisted surgery in urogynecology--our experience with the first 100 cases: experience from a single institution].
    Mustafa S; Mustafa M; Burke Y; Nibal AK; Deutsch M; Deutsch M; Lowenstein L
    Harefuah; 2014 Aug; 153(8):448-52, 499. PubMed ID: 25286633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Robotic-assisted gynecological surgeries: a series of the first 14 cases].
    Mejia-Gomez J; Kogan L; Mintz Y; Shveiky D; Benshushan A
    Harefuah; 2011 Sep; 150(9):709-12, 752, 751. PubMed ID: 22026054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive apical sacropexy: a retrospective review of laparoscopic and robotic operating room experiences.
    Pulliam SJ; Weinstein MM; Wakamatsu MM
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 22453324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implementation of a new procedure: laparoscopic versus robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Awad N; Mustafa S; Amit A; Deutsch M; Eldor-Itskovitz J; Lowenstein L
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jun; 287(6):1181-6. PubMed ID: 23274792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
    Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic abdominal sacrocolpopexy/sacrouteropexy repair of advanced female pelvic organ prolaspe (POP): utilizing POP-quantification-based staging and outcomes.
    Daneshgari F; Kefer JC; Moore C; Kaouk J
    BJU Int; 2007 Oct; 100(4):875-9. PubMed ID: 17822467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse.
    Elliott DS; Krambeck AE; Chow GK
    J Urol; 2006 Aug; 176(2):655-9. PubMed ID: 16813916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynaecological oncology; initial experience at Oslo Radium Hospital and 16 months follow-up.
    Sert MB; Eraker R
    Int J Med Robot; 2009 Dec; 5(4):410-4. PubMed ID: 19569081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
    Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
    Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pelvic floor function before and after robotic sacrocolpopexy: one-year outcomes.
    Geller EJ; Parnell BA; Dunivan GC
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):322-7. PubMed ID: 21458389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic sacral colpopexy.
    Antosh DD; Grotzke SA; McDonald MA; Shveiky D; Park AJ; Gutman RE; Sokol AI
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 22543767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for stage III pelvic organ prolapse.
    Louis-Sylvestre C; Herry M
    Int Urogynecol J; 2013 May; 24(5):731-3. PubMed ID: 23314225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.