307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21818575)
1. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy/sacrocervicopexy repair of pelvic organ prolapse: initial experience.
Göçmen A; Sanlıkan F; Uçar MG
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Mar; 285(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 21818575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Turkey's experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: a series of 25 consecutive cases.
Göçmen A; Sanlikan F; Uçar MG
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Aug; 282(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 19838722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic approaches to prolapse surgery.
Rosenblum N
Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Jul; 22(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 22647648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
Judd JP; Siddiqui NY; Barnett JC; Visco AG; Havrilesky LJ; Wu JM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20621010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term outcomes after robotic sacrocolpopexy in pelvic organ prolapse: prospective analysis.
Moreno Sierra J; Ortiz Oshiro E; Fernandez Pérez C; Galante Romo I; Corral Rosillo J; Prieto Nogal S; Castillon Vela IT; Silmi Moyano A; Alvarez Fernandez-Represa J
Urol Int; 2011; 86(4):414-8. PubMed ID: 21346319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes.
Geller EJ; Parnell BA; Dunivan GC
Urology; 2012 Mar; 79(3):532-6. PubMed ID: 22386392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Robotic-assisted surgery in urogynecology--our experience with the first 100 cases: experience from a single institution].
Mustafa S; Mustafa M; Burke Y; Nibal AK; Deutsch M; Deutsch M; Lowenstein L
Harefuah; 2014 Aug; 153(8):448-52, 499. PubMed ID: 25286633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Robotic-assisted gynecological surgeries: a series of the first 14 cases].
Mejia-Gomez J; Kogan L; Mintz Y; Shveiky D; Benshushan A
Harefuah; 2011 Sep; 150(9):709-12, 752, 751. PubMed ID: 22026054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive apical sacropexy: a retrospective review of laparoscopic and robotic operating room experiences.
Pulliam SJ; Weinstein MM; Wakamatsu MM
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 22453324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implementation of a new procedure: laparoscopic versus robotic sacrocolpopexy.
Awad N; Mustafa S; Amit A; Deutsch M; Eldor-Itskovitz J; Lowenstein L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jun; 287(6):1181-6. PubMed ID: 23274792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic abdominal sacrocolpopexy/sacrouteropexy repair of advanced female pelvic organ prolaspe (POP): utilizing POP-quantification-based staging and outcomes.
Daneshgari F; Kefer JC; Moore C; Kaouk J
BJU Int; 2007 Oct; 100(4):875-9. PubMed ID: 17822467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse.
Elliott DS; Krambeck AE; Chow GK
J Urol; 2006 Aug; 176(2):655-9. PubMed ID: 16813916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynaecological oncology; initial experience at Oslo Radium Hospital and 16 months follow-up.
Sert MB; Eraker R
Int J Med Robot; 2009 Dec; 5(4):410-4. PubMed ID: 19569081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pelvic floor function before and after robotic sacrocolpopexy: one-year outcomes.
Geller EJ; Parnell BA; Dunivan GC
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):322-7. PubMed ID: 21458389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic sacral colpopexy.
Antosh DD; Grotzke SA; McDonald MA; Shveiky D; Park AJ; Gutman RE; Sokol AI
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 22543767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for stage III pelvic organ prolapse.
Louis-Sylvestre C; Herry M
Int Urogynecol J; 2013 May; 24(5):731-3. PubMed ID: 23314225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
