These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21818575)
21. Robotic extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for bladder cancer with increased nodal yield. Lavery HJ; Martinez-Suarez HJ; Abaza R BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1802-5. PubMed ID: 21070571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and outcomes at a single high-volume institution. Ploumidis A; Spinoit AF; De Naeyer G; Schatteman P; Gan M; Ficarra V; Volpe A; Mottrie A Eur Urol; 2014 Jan; 65(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 23806518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Gynecologic use of robotically assisted laparoscopy: Sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high-grade vaginal vault prolapse. Elliott DS; Frank I; Dimarco DS; Chow GK Am J Surg; 2004 Oct; 188(4A Suppl):52S-56S. PubMed ID: 15476652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse using robot assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy: quality of life and technique. Mourik SL; Martens JE; Aktas M Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Nov; 165(1):122-7. PubMed ID: 22897838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for hysterectomy and pelvic organ prolapse repair. Paraiso MF Fertil Steril; 2014 Oct; 102(4):933-8. PubMed ID: 25274486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prospective evaluation of surgical outcomes of robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy and sacrocervicopexy for the management of apical pelvic support defects. Matthews CA; Carroll A; Hill A; Ramakrishnan V; Gill EJ South Med J; 2012 May; 105(5):274-8. PubMed ID: 22561541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Trendelenburg position in gynecologic robotic-assisted surgery. Ghomi A; Kramer C; Askari R; Chavan NR; Einarsson JI J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 22748954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse: 8 years experience. Granese R; Candiani M; Perino A; Romano F; Cucinella G Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Oct; 146(2):227-31. PubMed ID: 19615810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Learning experience using the double-console da Vinci surgical system in gynecology: a prospective cohort study in a University hospital. Marengo F; LarraĆn D; Babilonti L; Spinillo A Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Feb; 285(2):441-5. PubMed ID: 21779771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Safety and feasibility of robotic radical trachelectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Ramirez PT; Schmeler KM; Malpica A; Soliman PT Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Mar; 116(3):512-5. PubMed ID: 19944451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Role of apical support defect: correction in women undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery. Alas AN; Anger JT Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Oct; 26(5):386-92. PubMed ID: 25136761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A review of the current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. Lee RK; Mottrie A; Payne CK; Waltregny D Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1128-37. PubMed ID: 24433811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Symptomatic and anatomic 1-year outcomes after robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Siddiqui NY; Geller EJ; Visco AG Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 206(5):435.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22397900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Intraoperative Complications and Perioperative and Surgical Outcomes of Single-Port Robotics-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy. Oh S; Yi J; Song AY; Jee J; Bae N; Shin JH Int Urogynecol J; 2024 Jul; 35(7):1521-1526. PubMed ID: 38900162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. Di Marco DS; Chow GK; Gettman MT; Elliott DS Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):373-6. PubMed ID: 14972496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Long-term outcomes after totally robotic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Germain A; Thibault F; Galifet M; Scherrer ML; Ayav A; Hubert J; Brunaud L; Bresler L Surg Endosc; 2013 Feb; 27(2):525-9. PubMed ID: 22806530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Implementation of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: establishment of a learning curve and short-term outcomes. Mustafa S; Amit A; Filmar S; Deutsch M; Netzer I; Itskovitz-Eldor J; Lowenstein L Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Oct; 286(4):983-8. PubMed ID: 22648447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs. Advincula AP; Xu X; Goudeau S; Ransom SB J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):698-705. PubMed ID: 17980329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence]. Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]