These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2181867)

  • 1. An in vitro evaluation of bond strength of three glass ionomer cements.
    Fajen VB; Duncanson MG; Nanda RS; Currier GF; Angolkar PV
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Apr; 97(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 2181867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical evaluation of bonding with glass ionomer cement.
    Ravindranath VK; Kapoor DN; Sharma VP
    J Pierre Fauchard Acad; 1993 Mar; 7(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 9791242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bond strength of luting cements to core foundation materials.
    Hewlett S; Wadenya RO; Mante FK
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010 Mar; 31(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 20344899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resin-modified glass ionomer, modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation?--an in vitro evaluation.
    Millett DT; Cummings A; Letters S; Roger E; Love J
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Dec; 25(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 14700267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bond strength for orthodontic brackets contaminated by blood: composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Reddy L; Marker VA; Ellis E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Feb; 61(2):206-13. PubMed ID: 12618999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tensile bond force of glass ionomer cements in direct bonding of orthodontic brackets: an in vitro comparative study.
    Rezk-Lega F; Ogaard B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Oct; 100(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 1833971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in vitro study of the bond strength of a glass ionomer cement in the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets.
    Cook PA; Youngson CC
    Br J Orthod; 1988 Nov; 15(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 3060196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shear bond strengths of a glass ionomer for direct bonding in orthodontics.
    Wiltshire WA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Aug; 106(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 8059747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of glass-ionomers for bracket bonding--an ex vivo study evaluating a testing device for in vivo purposes.
    Ortendahl TW; Thilander B
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Apr; 20(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 9633174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bonding of hybrid ionomers and resin cements to modified orthodontic band materials.
    Mennemeyer VA; Neuman P; Powers JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Feb; 115(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 9971924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of dentin desensitizers and cementing agents on retention of full crowns using standardized crown preparations.
    Yim NH; Rueggeberg FA; Caughman WF; Gardner FM; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Apr; 83(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 10756297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vitro study of the bond strength of light-cured glass ionomer cement in the bonding of orthodontic brackets.
    Cook PA; Luther F; Youngson CC
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Apr; 18(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 8670931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diametral tensile strength and bonding to dentin of type I glass ionomer cements.
    Galun EA; Saleh N; Lewinstein I
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Oct; 72(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 7990049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A bond strength study of luted castable ceramic restorations.
    McInnes-Ledoux PM; Ledoux WR; Weinberg R
    J Dent Res; 1989 May; 68(5):823-5. PubMed ID: 2654232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of altering the type of enamel conditioner on the shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer adhesive.
    Bishara SE; Vonwald L; Laffoon JF; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Sep; 118(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 10982929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of enamel conditioning on bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composites.
    Attin T; Buchalla W; Hellwig E
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Jul; 76(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 8814631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Demineralization around orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and fluoride-releasing resin composite.
    Wilson RM; Donly KJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 11447960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Probability of failure of orthodontic brackets bonded with different cementing agents.
    Mitchell CA; O'Hagan E; Walker JM
    Dent Mater; 1995 Sep; 11(5):317-22. PubMed ID: 8595828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.