1352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21820147)
1. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.
Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ
Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk factors of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence of patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a single-center 10-year report.
Li K; Li H; Yang Y; Ian LH; Pun WH; Ho SF
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Apr; 124(7):1001-5. PubMed ID: 21542957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.
Shikanov S; Song J; Royce C; Al-Ahmadie H; Zorn K; Steinberg G; Zagaja G; Shalhav A; Eggener S
J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: what is the optimal procedure for the surgical margins? A single center experience.
Koutlidis N; Mourey E; Champigneulle J; Mangin P; Cormier L
Int J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1076-81. PubMed ID: 22860572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival.
Barocas DA; Salem S; Kordan Y; Herrell SD; Chang SS; Clark PE; Davis R; Baumgartner R; Phillips S; Cookson MS; Smith JA
J Urol; 2010 Mar; 183(3):990-6. PubMed ID: 20083261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.
Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD
Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy generate similar positive margin rates in low and intermediate risk patients.
Laurila TA; Huang W; Jarrard DF
Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(5):529-33. PubMed ID: 18640061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Localization of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy].
Salomon L; Levrel O; de la Taille A; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Prog Urol; 2002 Sep; 12(4):628-34. PubMed ID: 12463122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical significance of benign glands at surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy specimens.
Kohl SK; Balaji KC; Smith LM; Wilson NP; Johansson SL; Sterrett SP; Abrahams NA
Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1112-6. PubMed ID: 17572197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pretreatment expectations of patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic or open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Schroeck FR; Krupski TL; Stewart SB; Bañez LL; Gerber L; Albala DM; Moul JW
J Urol; 2012 Mar; 187(3):894-8. PubMed ID: 22245326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach.
Salomon L; Levrel O; Anastasiadis AG; Saint F; de La Taille A; Cicco A; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002; 5(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 12627213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: multiplicative interaction between surgical margin status and pathological stage.
Budäus L; Isbarn H; Eichelberg C; Lughezzani G; Sun M; Perrotte P; Chun FK; Salomon G; Steuber T; Köllermann J; Sauter G; Ahyai SA; Zacharias M; Fisch M; Schlomm T; Haese A; Heinzer H; Huland H; Montorsi F; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
J Urol; 2010 Oct; 184(4):1341-6. PubMed ID: 20723925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Marks RA; Koch MO; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Juliar BE; Cheng L
Hum Pathol; 2007 Aug; 38(8):1207-11. PubMed ID: 17490720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes.
Atug F; Castle EP; Srivastav SK; Burgess SV; Thomas R; Davis R
Eur Urol; 2006 May; 49(5):866-71; discussion 871-2. PubMed ID: 16564614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative analysis of surgical margins between radical retropubic prostatectomy and RALP: are patients sacrificed during initiation of robotics program?
White MA; De Haan AP; Stephens DD; Maatman TK; Maatman TJ
Urology; 2009 Mar; 73(3):567-71. PubMed ID: 19167036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of patient age on biochemical recurrence rates following radical prostatectomy.
Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Humphreys EB; Peck HJ; Trock BJ; Gonzalgo ML
J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1933-7; discussion 1937-8. PubMed ID: 17868723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the influence of site and number on progression.
Sofer M; Hamilton-Nelson KL; Civantos F; Soloway MS
J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2453-6. PubMed ID: 11992056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
