These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21821164)

  • 1. Choosing the esthetic angle of the face: experiments with laypersons and prosthodontists.
    Behrend DA; Harcourt JK; Adams GG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Aug; 106(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 21821164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics.
    Pinho S; Ciriaco C; Faber J; Lenza MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):748-53. PubMed ID: 18068592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-based evaluation of gender identification and morphologic classification of tooth face and arch forms.
    Berksun S; Hasanreisoğlu U; Gökdeniz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):578-84. PubMed ID: 12488849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Observable deviation of the facial and anterior tooth midlines.
    Cardash HS; Ormanier Z; Laufer BZ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):282-5. PubMed ID: 12644804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
    Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception of smile esthetics among Indian dental professionals and laypersons.
    Kumar S; Gandhi S; Valiathan A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):295. PubMed ID: 22945732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantification of the esthetics of dentists' before and after photographs.
    Rosenstiel SF; Pappas M; Pulido MT; Rashid RG
    J Dent; 2009; 37 Suppl 1():e64-9. PubMed ID: 19493605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An analysis of maxillary anterior teeth: facial and dental proportions.
    Hasanreisoglu U; Berksun S; Aras K; Arslan I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Dec; 94(6):530-8. PubMed ID: 16316799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship of facial anatomic landmarks with midlines of the face and mouth.
    Bidra AS; Uribe F; Taylor TD; Agar JR; Rungruanganunt P; Neace WP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):94-103. PubMed ID: 19643223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of increasing occlusal vertical dimension on lower facial form and perceived facial esthetics: A digital evaluation.
    Sun J; Lin YC; Lee JD; Lee SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Oct; 126(4):546-552. PubMed ID: 32981714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception differences of altered dental esthetics by dental professionals and laypersons.
    Thomas M; Reddy R; Reddy BJ
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):242-7. PubMed ID: 21891893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aesthetic evaluation of profile incisor inclination.
    Ghaleb N; Bouserhal J; Bassil-Nassif N
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Jun; 33(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 20716642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of the esthetic preferences of Spanish laypersons and dentists regarding the different width proportions of the maxillary anterior teeth.
    Rodríguez-López S; Escobedo Martínez MF; García-Pola M; Junquera LM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 May; 129(5):778-786. PubMed ID: 34452740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceived relative attractiveness of facial profiles with varying degrees of skeletal anomalies.
    Hönn M; Dietz K; Godt A; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2005 May; 66(3):187-96. PubMed ID: 15959632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations.
    Kokich VO; Kokich VG; Kiyak HA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 16905057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptions of facial aesthetics in two and three dimensions.
    Todd SA; Hammond P; Hutton T; Cochrane S; Cunningham S
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 15961568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A study of dentists' preferred maxillary anterior tooth width proportions: comparing the recurring esthetic dental proportion to other mathematical and naturally occurring proportions.
    Ward DH
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(6):324-37; discussion 338-9. PubMed ID: 18005282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, oral surgeons, and laypersons for Persian facial profiles.
    Imani MM; Sanei E; Niaki EA; Shahroudi AS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Sep; 154(3):412-420. PubMed ID: 30173845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laypersons' esthetic perception of various computer-generated diastemas: a pilot study.
    Noureddine A; Fron Chabouis H; Parenton S; Lasserre JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):914-20. PubMed ID: 24726592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Esthetic dental perception comparisons between 2D- and 3D-simulated dental discrepancies.
    Revilla-León M; Campbell HE; Meyer MJ; Umorin M; Sones A; Zandinejad A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):763-773. PubMed ID: 31982145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.