These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21821341)

  • 1. Minimally invasive approach to cases of lost intra-uterine device: a 7-year experience.
    Cetinkaya K; Kumtepe Y; Ingec M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):119-21. PubMed ID: 21821341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Removal of intra-abdominal intrauterine device by laparoscopy.
    Demir SC; Cetin MT; Ucünsak IF; Atay Y; Toksöz L; Kadayifçi O
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2002 Mar; 7(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 12041860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Clinical evaluation of hysteroscopy in management of missing and difficult-to-remove IUDs].
    Luo QD; Liu XZ; Wang DJ
    Shengzhi Yu Biyun; 1983 Aug; 3(3):41-3. PubMed ID: 12267400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trailing and treating the wandering IUD.
    Soderstrom RM
    Am J Gynecol Health; 1989; 3(3-S):33-4. PubMed ID: 12284997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The 'lost' intra-uterine contraceptive device (author's transl)].
    Tadjerouni A; Flici O; Wauters G; Hubinont PO
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1981; 10(5):473-8. PubMed ID: 7033343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perforated intraperitoneal intrauterine contraceptive devices: diagnosis, management, and clinical outcomes.
    Kho KA; Chamsy DJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):596-601. PubMed ID: 24462588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lost levonorgestrel IUD: diagnosis and therapy.
    Nitke S; Rabinerson D; Dekel A; Sheiner E; Kaplan B; Hackmon R
    Contraception; 2004 Apr; 69(4):289-93. PubMed ID: 15033403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic removal of intrauterine devices with retracted threads.
    Kristoffersen SE; Hald F; Gregersen E
    J Reprod Med; 1989 May; 34(5):339-40. PubMed ID: 2525187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hysteroscopic findings in complicated and non-complicated IUD users.
    El Sahwi S; Kamel M
    Adv Contracept Deliv Syst; 1992; 8(1-2):161-6. PubMed ID: 12285562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dislocated intrauterine devices: clinical presentations, diagnosis and management.
    Tabatabaei F; Masoumzadeh M
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2021 Apr; 26(2):160-166. PubMed ID: 33555216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Safe and cost-effective ultrasound guided removal of retained intrauterine device: our experience.
    Verma U; Astudillo-Dávalos FE; Gerkowicz SA
    Contraception; 2015 Jul; 92(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 25708503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnosis and management of intra-abdominal, mislocated intrauterine devices.
    Balci O; Mahmoud AS; Capar M; Colakoglu MC
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Jun; 281(6):1019-22. PubMed ID: 20157719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The width of the uterine cavity is narrower in patients with an embedded intrauterine device (IUD) compared to a normally positioned IUD.
    Shipp TD; Bromley B; Benacerraf BR
    J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Oct; 29(10):1453-6. PubMed ID: 20876899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Clinical study on 235 cases performed under hysteroscopy combined with laparoscopy].
    Duan H; Xia E; Wang L; Duan H
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jun; 37(6):342-5. PubMed ID: 12126568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
    Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Removal of completely perforating IUDs by explorative laparotomy.
    Abramovici H; Bornstein J; Faktor JH; Atad J; Pascal B
    Int J Fertil; 1987; 32(4):279-82. PubMed ID: 2887524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic removal of an intra-abdominal intrauterine device: case and systematic review.
    Gill RS; Mok D; Hudson M; Shi X; Birch DW; Karmali S
    Contraception; 2012 Jan; 85(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 22067801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of a hormonal intrauterine device causing uterine perforation: a case report.
    Berisavac M; Sparić R; Argirović R; Hudelist G; Zizić V
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2011; 139(11-12):815-8. PubMed ID: 22338483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The use of three-dimensional ultrasound imaging in detecting the type and location of intrauterine contraceptive device].
    Zhang S; Ying W; Xu J; Yang M; Xu K; Luo Q
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Apr; 82(7):459-61. PubMed ID: 12133515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Asymptomatic uterine perforation and IUD migration to the broad ligament: A case report.
    Jia G; Liu X; He Y; Du P; Sun Z; Chai W
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Feb; 103(7):e33857. PubMed ID: 38363896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.