These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. To patent or not to patent: the European Union's new biotech directive. Nenow L Houst J Int Law; 2001; 23(3):569-607. PubMed ID: 12769115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. French refuse to implement biotech patent directive. Louët S Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Aug; 18(8):820. PubMed ID: 10932143 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. US Supreme Court decision could compromise biotech patents. Robertson D Nat Biotechnol; 2001 May; 19(5):394. PubMed ID: 11328981 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Biotechnology patenting policy in the European Union--as exemplified by the development in Germany. Schrell A; Bauser H; Brunner H Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():13-39. PubMed ID: 17522818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biotech patents-business as usual? Lawrence S Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Dec; 26(12):1326. PubMed ID: 19060861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Roche's Taq patent 'obtained by deceit', rules US court. Dalton R Nature; 1999 Dec; 402(6763):709. PubMed ID: 10617182 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Patent first, ask questions later: morality and biotechnology in patent law. Bagley MA William Mary Law Rev; 2003 Dec; 45(2):469-547. PubMed ID: 15570677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Obviousness, hindsight and perspective: the impact of KSR v. Teleflex on biotech and pharmaceutical patents. Teitelbaum R; Cohen M Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Oct; 25(10):1105-6. PubMed ID: 17921990 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Intellectual property. Biotech feels a chill from changing U.S. patent rules. Servick K Science; 2014 Jul; 345(6192):14-5. PubMed ID: 24994626 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]