These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21822232)

  • 1. Supreme Court ruling prompts universities to tighten employee contracts.
    Roberts JP
    Nat Biotechnol; 2011 Aug; 29(8):678. PubMed ID: 21822232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Supreme Court boosts licensees in biotech patent battles.
    Waltz E
    Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Mar; 25(3):264-5. PubMed ID: 17344866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patents. Signature on visitor's form fuels Stanford v. Roche court battle.
    Marshall E
    Science; 2011 Apr; 332(6026):163. PubMed ID: 21474725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intellectual property. Universities ask Supreme Court to reverse patent ruling.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2003 Jan; 299(5603):26-7. PubMed ID: 12511618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Supreme Court decision on patent for HIV test unlikely to set major precedent.
    Waters H
    Nat Med; 2011 Jul; 17(7):758. PubMed ID: 21738136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Who owns federally funded research? The Supreme court and the Bayh-Dole act.
    Kesselheim AS; Rajkumar R
    N Engl J Med; 2011 Sep; 365(13):1167-9. PubMed ID: 21879888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. KSR v. Teleflex. Part 2: Impact of U.S Supreme Court Patent Law on Canadian and global systems-based innovation ecologies.
    Bouchard RA
    Health Law J; 2007; 15():247-94. PubMed ID: 19702185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Justices expand rights to experiment with patented drugs.
    Pollack A
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Jun; ():C1, C8. PubMed ID: 15966121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomarkers unbound--the Supreme Court's ruling on diagnostic-test patents.
    Kesselheim AS; Karlawish J
    N Engl J Med; 2012 Jun; 366(25):2338-40. PubMed ID: 22621421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gene patents remain controversial in biomedical research.
    Arnold C
    Lancet; 2013 Aug; 382(9891):495-6. PubMed ID: 23940849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ordering life: law and the normalization of biotechnology.
    Jasanoff S
    Not Polit; 2001; 17(62):34-50. PubMed ID: 15468485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Science and the law. Working through the patent problem.
    Walsh JP; Cohen WM; Arora A
    Science; 2003 Feb; 299(5609):1021. PubMed ID: 12586928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implications of recent US Supreme Court IP ruling for nanomedicine patents.
    Kim KY
    Nanomedicine (Lond); 2008 Apr; 3(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 18373420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. US Supreme Court applies strict limits to patents.
    Robertson D
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jul; 20(7):639. PubMed ID: 12089532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patents. U.S. Supreme Court delves into what is and isn't patentable.
    Marshall E
    Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5933):1374. PubMed ID: 19520926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Courts complicate industry-academia ties.
    Deftos LJ
    Science; 2011 Aug; 333(6044):823. PubMed ID: 21835999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Supreme Court hears argument on patenting life forms.
    Science; 1980 Apr; 208(4439):31-2. PubMed ID: 7361104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intellectual property. What good is a patent? Supreme Court may suggest an answer.
    Kintisch E
    Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5763):946-7. PubMed ID: 16484470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sponsored research agreements, university and government licensing, and clinical trial agreements: special contractual and intellectual property rights considerations.
    Somers JP
    J Biolaw Bus; 2003; 6(4):5-13. PubMed ID: 15072054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Take off your genes and let the doctor have a look: why the Mayo and Myriad decisions have invalidated method claims for genetic diagnostic testing.
    Bergin C
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2013; 63(1):173-217. PubMed ID: 25335200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.