These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21822426)

  • 1. Academic software applications for electromagnetic brain mapping using MEG and EEG.
    Baillet S; Friston K; Oostenveld R
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2011; 2011():972050. PubMed ID: 21822426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
    Engemann DA; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. EEG and MEG: relevance to neuroscience.
    Lopes da Silva F
    Neuron; 2013 Dec; 80(5):1112-28. PubMed ID: 24314724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simultaneous EEG and MEG source reconstruction in sparse electromagnetic source imaging.
    Ding L; Yuan H
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2013 Apr; 34(4):775-95. PubMed ID: 22102512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Brainstorm: a user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis.
    Tadel F; Baillet S; Mosher JC; Pantazis D; Leahy RM
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2011; 2011():879716. PubMed ID: 21584256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. SimMEEG software for simulating event-related MEG and EEG data with underlying functional connectivity.
    Herdman AT
    J Neurosci Methods; 2021 Feb; 350():109017. PubMed ID: 33316316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantification of the benefit from integrating MEG and EEG data in minimum l2-norm estimation.
    Molins A; Stufflebeam SM; Brown EN; Hämäläinen MS
    Neuroimage; 2008 Sep; 42(3):1069-77. PubMed ID: 18602485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of epileptiform activity by human interpreters: blinded comparison between electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography.
    Iwasaki M; Pestana E; Burgess RC; Lüders HO; Shamoto H; Nakasato N
    Epilepsia; 2005 Jan; 46(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 15660769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mapping the signal-to-noise-ratios of cortical sources in magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
    Goldenholz DM; Ahlfors SP; Hämäläinen MS; Sharon D; Ishitobi M; Vaina LM; Stufflebeam SM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Apr; 30(4):1077-86. PubMed ID: 18465745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MEG-EEG Information Fusion and Electromagnetic Source Imaging: From Theory to Clinical Application in Epilepsy.
    Chowdhury RA; Zerouali Y; Hedrich T; Heers M; Kobayashi E; Lina JM; Grova C
    Brain Topogr; 2015 Nov; 28(6):785-812. PubMed ID: 26016950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dipole models for the EEG and MEG.
    Schimpf PH; Ramon C; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 12002172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ELAN: a software package for analysis and visualization of MEG, EEG, and LFP signals.
    Aguera PE; Jerbi K; Caclin A; Bertrand O
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2011; 2011():158970. PubMed ID: 21687568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new wavelet transform to sparsely represent cortical current densities for EEG/MEG inverse problems.
    Liao K; Zhu M; Ding L
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Aug; 111(2):376-88. PubMed ID: 23706527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing the potential of MEG and EEG to uncover brain tracking of speech temporal envelope.
    Destoky F; Philippe M; Bertels J; Verhasselt M; Coquelet N; Vander Ghinst M; Wens V; De Tiège X; Bourguignon M
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():201-213. PubMed ID: 30205208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combined mapping of human auditory EEG and MEG responses.
    Huotilainen M; Winkler I; Alho K; Escera C; Virtanen J; Ilmoniemi RJ; Jääskeläinen IP; Pekkonen E; Näätänen R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Jul; 108(4):370-9. PubMed ID: 9714379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the use of EEG or MEG brain imaging tools in neuromarketing research.
    Vecchiato G; Astolfi L; De Vico Fallani F; Toppi J; Aloise F; Bez F; Wei D; Kong W; Dai J; Cincotti F; Mattia D; Babiloni F
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2011; 2011():643489. PubMed ID: 21960996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unified Expression of the Quasi-Static Electromagnetic Field: Demonstration With MEG and EEG Signals.
    Taulu S; Larson E
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2021 Mar; 68(3):992-1004. PubMed ID: 32746058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring the cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity with EEG and MEG.
    Siems M; Pape AA; Hipp JF; Siegel M
    Neuroimage; 2016 Apr; 129():345-355. PubMed ID: 26827813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity of MEG and EEG to source orientation.
    Ahlfors SP; Han J; Belliveau JW; Hämäläinen MS
    Brain Topogr; 2010 Sep; 23(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 20640882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.