96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2182253)
1. Cemented versus cementless total hip arthroplasty. A critical review.
Rothman RH; Cohn JC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 May; (254):153-69. PubMed ID: 2182253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does cement increase the risk of infection in primary total hip arthroplasty? Revision rates in 56,275 cemented and uncemented primary THAs followed for 0-16 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
Engesaeter LB; Espehaug B; Lie SA; Furnes O; Havelin LI
Acta Orthop; 2006 Jun; 77(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 16819671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years.
Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
Acta Orthop; 2005 Feb; 76(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 15788305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The rationale for cementless revision total hip replacement with contemporary technology.
Gorab RS; Covino BM; Borden LS
Orthop Clin North Am; 1993 Oct; 24(4):627-33. PubMed ID: 8414428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Results of uncemented cups: a critical appraisal at 15 years.
Harris WH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Dec; (417):121-5. PubMed ID: 14646709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Current knowledge and future perspectives of cementless endoprosthetics].
Hungerford DS; Krackow KA; Lennox DW
Orthopade; 1987 Jun; 16(3):220-4. PubMed ID: 3627794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.
Digas G
Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Feb; 76(315):3-82. PubMed ID: 15790289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Should monobloc cemented stems be systematically revised during revision total hip arthroplasty? A prospective evaluation].
Grosjean G; Courpied JP; Moindreau M; Hunou N; Mathieu M; Hamadouche M
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Nov; 94(7):670-7. PubMed ID: 18984124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Total hip arthroplasty in the young adult.
Callaghan JJ; Forest EE; Sporer SM; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Nov; (344):257-62. PubMed ID: 9372776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Ten-year experience with the Aldinger custom-made total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of the results].
Masár J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Jun; 74(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 17623605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cementless versus cemented total hip arthroplasty. A scientific controversy?
Wroblewski BM
Orthop Clin North Am; 1993 Oct; 24(4):591-7. PubMed ID: 8414424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Internal fixation versus arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: what is the evidence?
Heetveld MJ; Rogmark C; Frihagen F; Keating J
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Jul; 23(6):395-402. PubMed ID: 19550224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A preliminary report of the use of a cementless acetabular component with a cemented femoral component.
Davey JR; Harris WH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Aug; (245):150-5. PubMed ID: 2752615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Metal-on-metal hip replacement using Metasul cups cemented into Muller reinforcement rings after a mean 5-year (3-8) follow-up: improvement of acetabular fixation by comparing with direct cementation to bone].
Girard J; Herent S; Combes A; Pinoit Y; Soenen M; Laffargue P; Migaud H
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 18555860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acetabular liner fixation by cement.
Jiranek WA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Dec; (417):217-23. PubMed ID: 14646720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Long-term results of the Schenker cementless femoral component].
Dzupa V; Cech O; Sesták M; Klézl Z
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 15151096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Partially cemented AncaDualFit hip stems do not fail in simulated active patients.
Cristofolini L; Erani P; Teutonico AS; Traina F; Viceconti M; Toni A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Feb; 22(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 17070631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cemented total hip arthroplasty with contemporary techniques. A five-year minimum follow-up study.
Russotti GM; Coventry MB; Stauffer RN
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Oct; (235):141-7. PubMed ID: 3416521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Nicolas Andry award: comparative results of cemented and cementless total hip arthroplasty.
Rorabeck CH; Bourne RB; Mulliken BD; Nayak N; Laupacis A; Tugwell P; Feeney D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Apr; (325):330-44. PubMed ID: 8998896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the outcome of cemented all-polyethylene and cementless metal-backed acetabular sockets in primary total hip arthroplasty.
Hartofilakidis G; Georgiades G; Babis GC
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Feb; 24(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 18534419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
