570 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21823821)
1. Monte Carlo simulations of therapeutic proton beams for relative biological effectiveness of double-strand break.
Wang CC; Hsiao Y; Lee CC; Chao TC; Wang CC; Tung CJ
Int J Radiat Biol; 2012 Jan; 88(1-2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21823821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Monte Carlo simulations of the relative biological effectiveness for DNA double strand breaks from 300 MeV u(-1) carbon-ion beams.
Huang YW; Pan CY; Hsiao YY; Chao TC; Lee CC; Tung CJ
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Aug; 60(15):5995-6012. PubMed ID: 26183156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A mechanism-based approach to predict the relative biological effectiveness of protons and carbon ions in radiation therapy.
Frese MC; Yu VK; Stewart RD; Carlson DJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 May; 83(1):442-50. PubMed ID: 22099045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiobiological characterization of two therapeutic proton beams with different initial energy spectra used at the Institut Curie Proton Therapy Center in Orsay.
Calugaru V; Nauraye C; Noël G; Giocanti N; Favaudon V; Mégnin-Chanet F
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Nov; 81(4):1136-43. PubMed ID: 21075549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nuclear interactions in proton therapy: dose and relative biological effect distributions originating from primary and secondary particles.
Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Mar; 47(5):747-64. PubMed ID: 11931469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Empirical model estimation of relative biological effectiveness for proton beam therapy.
Chen Y; Ahmad S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Apr; 149(2):116-23. PubMed ID: 21593038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variations in the RBE for cell killing along the depth-dose profile of a modulated proton therapy beam.
Britten RA; Nazaryan V; Davis LK; Klein SB; Nichiporov D; Mendonca MS; Wolanski M; Nie X; George J; Keppel C
Radiat Res; 2013 Jan; 179(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 23148508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relative biological effectiveness variation along monoenergetic and modulated Bragg peaks of a 62-MeV therapeutic proton beam: a preclinical assessment.
Chaudhary P; Marshall TI; Perozziello FM; Manti L; Currell FJ; Hanton F; McMahon SJ; Kavanagh JN; Cirrone GA; Romano F; Prise KM; Schettino G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Sep; 90(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 24986743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monte Carlo simulation of DNA damage induction by x-rays and selected radioisotopes.
Hsiao Y; Stewart RD
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(1):233-44. PubMed ID: 18182699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rapid MCNP simulation of DNA double strand break (DSB) relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for photons, neutrons, and light ions.
Stewart RD; Streitmatter SW; Argento DC; Kirkby C; Goorley JT; Moffitt G; Jevremovic T; Sandison GA
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Nov; 60(21):8249-74. PubMed ID: 26449929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of indirect actions and oxygen on relative biological effectiveness: estimate of DSB inductions and conversions induced by therapeutic proton beams.
Luo WR; Chen FH; Huang RJ; Chen YP; Hsiao YY
Int J Radiat Biol; 2020 Feb; 96(2):187-196. PubMed ID: 31682784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Calculation of relative biological effectiveness for proton beams using biological weighting functions.
Paganetti H; Olko P; Kobus H; Becker R; Schmitz T; Waligorski MP; Filges D; Müller-Gärtner HW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Feb; 37(3):719-29. PubMed ID: 9112472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interaction between the biological effects of high- and low-LET radiation dose components in a mixed field exposure.
Mason AJ; Giusti V; Green S; Munck af Rosenschöld P; Beynon TD; Hopewell JW
Int J Radiat Biol; 2011 Dec; 87(12):1162-72. PubMed ID: 21923301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of radiation quality and oxygen on clustered DNA lesions and cell death.
Stewart RD; Yu VK; Georgakilas AG; Koumenis C; Park JH; Carlson DJ
Radiat Res; 2011 Nov; 176(5):587-602. PubMed ID: 21823972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiobiological intercomparison of the 160 MeV and 230 MeV proton therapy beams at the Harvard Cyclotron Laboratory and at Massachusetts General Hospital.
Wouters BG; Skarsgard LD; Gerweck LE; Carabe-Fernandez A; Wong M; Durand RE; Nielson D; Bussiere MR; Wagner M; Biggs P; Paganetti H; Suit HD
Radiat Res; 2015 Feb; 183(2):174-87. PubMed ID: 25587741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Difference in the relative biological effectiveness and DNA damage repair processes in response to proton beam therapy according to the positions of the spread out Bragg peak.
Hojo H; Dohmae T; Hotta K; Kohno R; Motegi A; Yagishita A; Makinoshima H; Tsuchihara K; Akimoto T
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Jul; 12(1):111. PubMed ID: 28673358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of X-ray and proton beam low energy secondary electron track structures using the low energy models of Geant4.
McNamara AL; Guatelli S; Prokopovich DA; Reinhard MI; Rosenfeld AB
Int J Radiat Biol; 2012 Jan; 88(1-2):164-70. PubMed ID: 22040102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. RBE of kV CBCT radiation determined by Monte Carlo DNA damage simulations.
Kirkby C; Ghasroddashti E; Poirier Y; Tambasco M; Stewart RD
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Aug; 58(16):5693-704. PubMed ID: 23899567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proton and light ion RBE for the induction of direct DNA double strand breaks.
Pater P; Bäckstöm G; Villegas F; Ahnesjö A; Enger SA; Seuntjens J; El Naqa I
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2131. PubMed ID: 27147325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of penh, fluka, and Geant4/topas for absorbed dose calculations in air cavities representing ionization chambers in high-energy photon and proton beams.
Baumann KS; Horst F; Zink K; Gomà C
Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 46(10):4639-4653. PubMed ID: 31350915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
