BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21823948)

  • 1. Potential of pedestrian protection systems--a parameter study using finite element models of pedestrian dummy and generic passenger vehicles.
    Fredriksson R; Shin J; Untaroiu CD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Aug; 12(4):398-411. PubMed ID: 21823948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of vehicle impact velocity, vehicle front-end shapes on pedestrian injury risk.
    Han Y; Yang J; Mizuno K; Matsui Y
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2012 Sep; 13(5):507-18. PubMed ID: 22931181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parameter study for child injury mitigation in near-side impacts through FE simulations.
    Andersson M; Pipkorn B; Lövsund P
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(2):182-92. PubMed ID: 22458797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An analysis of head impact severity in simulations of collisions between pedestrians and SUVs/work utility vehicles, and sedans.
    Anderson RW; Doecke S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Aug; 12(4):388-97. PubMed ID: 21823947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of Integrated Pedestrian Protection Systems with Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) and Passive Safety Components.
    Edwards M; Nathanson A; Carroll J; Wisch M; Zander O; Lubbe N
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S2-S11. PubMed ID: 26027971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of precrash velocity reduction on occupant response using a human body finite element model.
    Guleyupoglu B; Schap J; Kusano KD; Gayzik FS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Jul; 18(5):508-514. PubMed ID: 28102701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A real-life based evaluation method of deployable vulnerable road user protection systems.
    Fredriksson R; Dahlgren M; van Schijndel M; de Hair S; van Montfort S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S183-9. PubMed ID: 25307385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pedestrian headform testing: inferring performance at impact speeds and for headform masses not tested, and estimating average performance in a range of real-world conditions.
    Hutchinson TP; Anderson RW; Searson DJ
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(4):402-11. PubMed ID: 22817556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A study of adult pedestrian head impact conditions and injury risks in passenger car collisions based on real-world accident data.
    Peng Y; Deck C; Yang J; Otte D; Willinger R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(6):639-46. PubMed ID: 23859362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methods to mitigate injury to toddlers in near-side impact crashes.
    Kapoor T; Altenhof W; Howard A; Rasico J; Zhu F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Nov; 40(6):1880-92. PubMed ID: 19068290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influences of pre-crash braking induced dummy - forward displacements on dummy behaviour during EuroNCAP frontal crashtest.
    Woitsch G; Sinz W
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():268-75. PubMed ID: 24211558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimizing the passenger air bag of an adaptive restraint system for multiple size occupants.
    Bai Z; Jiang B; Zhu F; Cao L
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(6):556-63. PubMed ID: 24867567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rear seat child safety in near-side impacts: a modeling study of common sitting positions.
    Andersson M; Pipkorn B; Lövsund P
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 23343030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimate of potential benefit for Europe of fitting Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) systems for pedestrian protection to passenger cars.
    Edwards M; Nathanson A; Wisch M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S173-82. PubMed ID: 25307384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of collision damage mitigation braking systems and their effects on human injury in the event of car-to-pedestrian accidents.
    Matsui Y; Han Y; Mizuno K
    Stapp Car Crash J; 2011 Nov; 55():461-78. PubMed ID: 22869318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pedestrian head impact conditions depending on the vehicle front shape and its construction--full model simulation.
    Okamoto Y; Sugimoto T; Enomoto K; Kikuchi J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2003 Mar; 4(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 14522665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The correlation between pedestrian injury severity in real-life crashes and Euro NCAP pedestrian test results.
    Strandroth J; Rizzi M; Sternlund S; Lie A; Tingvall C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Dec; 12(6):604-13. PubMed ID: 22133337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bumper and grille airbags concept for enhanced vehicle compatibility in side impact: phase II.
    Barbat S; Li X; Prasad P
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14 Suppl():S30-9. PubMed ID: 23905559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimization of analytical injury metrics for head impact injuries.
    Sanchez-Molina D; Velazquez-Ameijide J; Arregui-Dalmases C; Crandall JR; Untaroiu CD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(3):278-85. PubMed ID: 22607250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pedestrian injury mitigation by autonomous braking.
    Rosén E; Källhammer JE; Eriksson D; Nentwich M; Fredriksson R; Smith K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):1949-57. PubMed ID: 20728647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.