These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21823968)

  • 1. Justifying age thresholds for mammographic screening: an application of pragma-dialectical argumentation theory.
    Schulz PJ; Meuffels B
    Health Commun; 2012; 27(2):167-78. PubMed ID: 21823968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
    Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of bilateral breast cancer at biennial screening mammography in the Netherlands: a population-based study.
    Setz-Pels W; Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Voogd AC; Jansen FH; Hooijen MJ; Louwman MW
    Radiology; 2011 Aug; 260(2):357-63. PubMed ID: 21474705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Matching health messages to monitor-blunter coping styles to motivate screening mammography.
    Williams-Piehota P; Pizarro J; Schneider TR; Mowad L; Salovey P
    Health Psychol; 2005 Jan; 24(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 15631563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening mammography: value in women 35-39 years old.
    Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Deutch BM; Thaler HT; Lippin BS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8517320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of mammography as a breast cancer screening tool in six districts in France.
    Lacour A; Mamelle N; Lafont S; Bazin B; Dubuc M; Exbrayat C; Trugeon A; Grosclaude P
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1997; 21(5):460-70. PubMed ID: 9307849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer.
    Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Eaton A; Ernster V
    JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(20):2444-50. PubMed ID: 8230621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Matching health messages to information-processing styles: need for cognition and mammography utilization.
    Williams-Piehota P; Schneider TR; Pizarro J; Mowad L; Salovey P
    Health Commun; 2003; 15(4):375-92. PubMed ID: 14527864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammographic screening after the age of 65 years: evidence for a reduction in breast cancer mortality.
    Van Dijck JA; Verbeek AL; Beex LV; Hendriks JH; Holland R; Mravunac M; Straatman H; Werre JM
    Int J Cancer; 1996 Jun; 66(6):727-31. PubMed ID: 8647640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mammographic screening in women at increased risk of breast cancer after treatment of Hodgkin's disease.
    Kwong A; Hancock SL; Bloom JR; Pal S; Birdwell RL; Mariscal C; Ikeda DM
    Breast J; 2008; 14(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 18186864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast screening practices among primary physicians: reality and potential.
    Rimer BK; Trock B; Balshem A; Engstrom PF; Rosan J; Lerman C
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1990; 3(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 2305638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico.
    Rosenberg RD; Hunt WC; Williamson MR; Gilliland FD; Wiest PW; Kelsey CA; Key CR; Linver MN
    Radiology; 1998 Nov; 209(2):511-8. PubMed ID: 9807581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammographic screening is dramatically changing age-incidence data for breast cancer.
    Hemminki K; Rawal R; Bermejo JL
    J Clin Oncol; 2004 Nov; 22(22):4652-3. PubMed ID: 15542818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceived susceptibility to breast cancer moderates the effect of gain- and loss-framed messages on use of screening mammography.
    Gallagher KM; Updegraff JA; Rothman AJ; Sims L
    Health Psychol; 2011 Mar; 30(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 21401248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
    May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient and tumor characteristics of bilateral breast cancer at screening mammography in the Netherlands, a population-based study.
    Setz-Pels W; Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Louwman MW; Jansen FH; van Beek M; Plaisier ML; Voogd AC
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Oct; 129(3):955-61. PubMed ID: 21553118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The 2003 Australian Breast Health Survey: survey design and preliminary results.
    Villanueva EV; Jones S; Nehill C; Favelle S; Steel D; Iverson D; Zorbas H
    BMC Public Health; 2008 Jan; 8():13. PubMed ID: 18194528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Routine screening mammography in women older than 74 years: a review of the available data.
    Galit W; Green MS; Lital KB
    Maturitas; 2007 Jun; 57(2):109-19. PubMed ID: 17336004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attitudes, age, and participation in mammographic screening: a prospective analysis.
    Taplin SH; Montano DE
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1993; 6(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 8421925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.