These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21824021)

  • 1. Better safe than sorry: simplistic fear-relevant stimuli capture attention.
    Forbes SJ; Purkis HM; Lipp OV
    Cogn Emot; 2011 Aug; 25(5):794-804. PubMed ID: 21824021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Some animal specific fears are more specific than others: Evidence from attention and emotion measures.
    Soares SC; Esteves F; Lundqvist D; Ohman A
    Behav Res Ther; 2009 Dec; 47(12):1032-42. PubMed ID: 19695561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. But what about the Empress of Racnoss? The allocation of attention to spiders and Doctor Who in a visual search task is predicted by fear and expertise.
    Purkis HM; Lester KJ; Field AP
    Emotion; 2011 Dec; 11(6):1484-8. PubMed ID: 21707142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Task relevance modulates processing of distracting emotional stimuli.
    Lichtenstein-Vidne L; Henik A; Safadi Z
    Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 21598126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs.
    Wykowska A; Schubö A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):645-60. PubMed ID: 19929330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fear, but not fear-relevance, modulates reaction times in visual search with animal distractors.
    Soares SC; Esteves F; Flykt A
    J Anxiety Disord; 2009 Jan; 23(1):136-44. PubMed ID: 18565724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mandatory processing of irrelevant fearful face features in visual search.
    Fenker DB; Heipertz D; Boehler CN; Schoenfeld MA; Noesselt T; Heinze HJ; Duezel E; Hopf JM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Dec; 22(12):2926-38. PubMed ID: 19702468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of fear-relevant stimuli in visual search: a comparison of phylogenetic and ontogenetic stimuli.
    Brosch T; Sharma D
    Emotion; 2005 Sep; 5(3):360-4. PubMed ID: 16187872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Task-irrelevant angry faces capture attention in visual search while modulated by resources.
    Huang SL; Chang YC; Chen YJ
    Emotion; 2011 Jun; 11(3):544-52. PubMed ID: 21517157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of fear and expectancies in capture of covert attention by spiders.
    Devue C; Belopolsky AV; Theeuwes J
    Emotion; 2011 Aug; 11(4):768-75. PubMed ID: 21604868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The cognitive locus of distraction by acoustic novelty in the cross-modal oddball task.
    Parmentier FB; Elford G; Escera C; Andrés P; San Miguel I
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):408-32. PubMed ID: 17445791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Task-relevance modulates the effects of peripheral distractors.
    Lichtenstein-Vidne L; Henik A; Safadi Z
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Sep; 60(9):1216-26. PubMed ID: 17676554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture.
    Gronau N; Cohen A; Ben-Shakhar G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1685-95. PubMed ID: 19382007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Nobre AC; Rao A; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Don't be afraid of irrelevant words: the emotional Stroop effect is confined to attended words.
    Frings C; Wühr P
    Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(6):1056-68. PubMed ID: 22404379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of disgust on anxiety ratings to fear-relevant, disgust-relevant and fear-irrelevant stimuli.
    Davey GC; Macdonald BA; Brierley L
    J Anxiety Disord; 2008 Dec; 22(8):1347-54. PubMed ID: 18343631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Instructed fear stimuli bias visual attention.
    Deltomme B; Mertens G; Tibboel H; Braem S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Mar; 184():31-38. PubMed ID: 28889903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.