These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21824406)

  • 21. Filling the concept with data: integrating data from different in vitro and in silico assays on skin sensitizers to explore the battery approach for animal-free skin sensitization testing.
    Natsch A; Emter R; Ellis G
    Toxicol Sci; 2009 Jan; 107(1):106-21. PubMed ID: 18832184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment.
    Kimber I; Basketter DA; Berthold K; Butler M; Garrigue JL; Lea L; Newsome C; Roggeband R; Steiling W; Stropp G; Waterman S; Wiemann C
    Toxicol Sci; 2001 Feb; 59(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 11158712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A data-based exploration of the adverse outcome pathway for skin sensitization points to the necessary requirements for its prediction with alternative methods.
    Benigni R; Bossa C; Tcheremenskaia O
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Jul; 78():45-52. PubMed ID: 27090483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Computer models versus reality: how well do in silico models currently predict the sensitization potential of a substance.
    Teubner W; Mehling A; Schuster PX; Guth K; Worth A; Burton J; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 67(3):468-85. PubMed ID: 24090701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multivariate models for prediction of human skin sensitization hazard.
    Strickland J; Zang Q; Paris M; Lehmann DM; Allen D; Choksi N; Matheson J; Jacobs A; Casey W; Kleinstreuer N
    J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Mar; 37(3):347-360. PubMed ID: 27480324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prediction of chemical respiratory sensitizers using GARD, a novel in vitro assay based on a genomic biomarker signature.
    Forreryd A; Johansson H; Albrekt AS; Borrebaeck CA; Lindstedt M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0118808. PubMed ID: 25760038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Characterization of dermal sensitization potential for industrial or agricultural chemicals with EpiSensA.
    Mizumachi H; LeBaron MJ; Settivari RS; Miyazawa M; Marty MS; Sakaguchi H
    J Appl Toxicol; 2021 Jun; 41(6):915-927. PubMed ID: 33124094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Local lymph node assay (LLNA) for detection of sensitization capacity of chemicals.
    Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
    Methods; 2007 Jan; 41(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 16938465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Test battery with the human cell line activation test, direct peptide reactivity assay and DEREK based on a 139 chemical data set for predicting skin sensitizing potential and potency of chemicals.
    Takenouchi O; Fukui S; Okamoto K; Kurotani S; Imai N; Fujishiro M; Kyotani D; Kato Y; Kasahara T; Fujita M; Toyoda A; Sekiya D; Watanabe S; Seto H; Hirota M; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M
    J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 35(11):1318-32. PubMed ID: 25820183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A quantitative in silico model for predicting skin sensitization using a nearest neighbours approach within expert-derived structure-activity alert spaces.
    Canipa SJ; Chilton ML; Hemingway R; Macmillan DS; Myden A; Plante JP; Tennant RE; Vessey JD; Steger-Hartmann T; Gould J; Hillegass J; Etter S; Smith BPC; White A; Sterchele P; De Smedt A; O'Brien D; Parakhia R
    J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Aug; 37(8):985-995. PubMed ID: 28244128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Skin Sensitization Tests: The LLNA and the RhE IL-18 Potency Assay.
    Corsini E; Gibbs S; Roggen E; Kimber I; Basketter DA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2240():13-29. PubMed ID: 33423223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development of a new in vitro skin sensitization assay (Epidermal Sensitization Assay; EpiSensA) using reconstructed human epidermis.
    Saito K; Nukada Y; Takenouchi O; Miyazawa M; Sakaguchi H; Nishiyama N
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2013 Dec; 27(8):2213-24. PubMed ID: 23999411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Benchmarking of BMDC assay and related QSAR study for identifying sensitizing chemicals.
    Chedik L; Baybekov S; Marcou G; Cosnier F; Mourot-Bousquenaud M; Jacquenet S; Varnek A; Battais F
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2024 May; 149():105623. PubMed ID: 38631606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Skin irritation and sensitization: mechanisms and new approaches for risk assessment.
    Basketter D; Darlenski R; Fluhr JW
    Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2008; 21(4):191-202. PubMed ID: 18509253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of the GARD assay in a blind Cosmetics Europe study.
    Johansson H; Gradin R; Forreryd A; Agemark M; Zeller K; Johansson A; Larne O; van Vliet E; Borrebaeck C; Lindstedt M
    ALTEX; 2017; 34(4):515-523. PubMed ID: 28214915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Integrated decision strategies for skin sensitization hazard.
    Strickland J; Zang Q; Kleinstreuer N; Paris M; Lehmann DM; Choksi N; Matheson J; Jacobs A; Lowit A; Allen D; Casey W
    J Appl Toxicol; 2016 Sep; 36(9):1150-62. PubMed ID: 26851134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In vitro testing strategy for assessing the skin sensitizing potential of "difficult to test" cosmetic ingredients.
    Bergal M; Puginier M; Gerbeix C; Groux H; Roso A; Cottrez F; Milius A
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2020 Jun; 65():104781. PubMed ID: 32001296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Applicability of a keratinocyte gene signature to predict skin sensitizing potential.
    van der Veen JW; Pronk TE; van Loveren H; Ezendam J
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2013 Feb; 27(1):314-22. PubMed ID: 22935770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Development of quantitative model of a local lymph node assay for evaluating skin sensitization potency applying machine learning CatBoost.
    Ambe K; Suzuki M; Ashikaga T; Tohkin M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Oct; 125():105019. PubMed ID: 34311055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Non-enzymatic glutathione reactivity and in vitro toxicity: a non-animal approach to skin sensitization.
    Aptula AO; Patlewicz G; Roberts DW; Schultz TW
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2006 Mar; 20(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 16112535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.