BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21824712)

  • 1. External validation of the adapted Risk of Malignancy Index incorporating tumor size in the preoperative evaluation of adnexal masses.
    van den Akker PA; Zusterzeel PL; Aalders AL; Snijders MP; Samlal RA; Vollebergh JH; Kluivers KB; Massuger LF
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Dec; 159(2):422-5. PubMed ID: 21824712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the Risk of Malignancy Index in daily clinical management of adnexal masses.
    van den Akker PA; Aalders AL; Snijders MP; Kluivers KB; Samlal RA; Vollebergh JH; Massuger LF
    Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Mar; 116(3):384-8. PubMed ID: 19959215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The risk of malignancy index in discrimination of adnexal masses.
    Ulusoy S; Akbayir O; Numanoglu C; Ulusoy N; Odabas E; Gulkilik A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2007 Mar; 96(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 17280665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The risk of malignancy index (RMI) in women with adnexal masses in Wales.
    Abdulrahman GO; McKnight L; Lutchman Singh K
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Sep; 53(3):376-81. PubMed ID: 25286794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preoperative multimodal strategies for risk assessment of adnexal masses: analysis of 1362 cases in a gynecologic cancer center.
    Radosa MP; Camara O; Vorwergk J; Diebolder H; Winzer H; Mothes A; Gajda M; Runnebaum IB
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Aug; 21(6):1056-62. PubMed ID: 21633301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Di Legge A; Testa AC; Ameye L; Van Calster B; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Savelli L; Franchi D; Czekierdowski A; Trio D; Van Holsbeke C; Ferrazzi E; Scambia G; Timmerman D; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22611001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk of malignancy index in preoperative evaluation of pelvic masses.
    Ashrafgangooei T; Rezaeezadeh M
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(7):1727-30. PubMed ID: 22126553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sonographic discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses in premenopause.
    Radosa MP; Vorwergk J; Fitzgerald J; Kaehler C; Schneider U; Camara O; Runnebaum IB; Schleußner E
    Ultraschall Med; 2014 Aug; 35(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 23775448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of risk of malignancy index (RMI), CA125, CA 19-9, ultrasound score, and menopausal status in borderline ovarian tumor.
    Alanbay I; Akturk E; Coksuer H; Ercan M; Karaşahin E; Dede M; Yenen MC; Ozan H; Baser I
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2012 Jun; 28(6):478-82. PubMed ID: 22122561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of a risk of malignancy index in clinical approaches to adnexal masses.
    Simsek HS; Tokmak A; Ozgu E; Doganay M; Danisman N; Erkaya S; Gungor T
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(18):7793-7. PubMed ID: 25292065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Artificial neural network models for the preoperative discrimination between malignant and benign adnexal masses.
    Timmerman D; Verrelst H; Bourne TH; De Moor B; Collins WP; Vergote I; Vandewalle J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jan; 13(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 10201082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differential diagnosis of adnexal masses with transvaginal sonography, color flow imaging, and serum CA 125 assay in pre- and postmenopausal women.
    Strigini FA; Gadducci A; Del Bravo B; Ferdeghini M; Genazzani AR
    Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Apr; 61(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 8626120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods.
    Meys EMJ; Jeelof LS; Achten NMJ; Slangen BFM; Lambrechts S; Kruitwagen RFPM; Van Gorp T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):784-792. PubMed ID: 27514486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk of malignancy index validity assessment in premenopausal and postmenopausal women with adnexal tumors.
    Terzic M; Dotlic J; Likic I; Brndusic N; Pilic I; Ladjevic N; Maricic S; Arsenovic N; Maricic Z
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jun; 52(2):253-7. PubMed ID: 23915860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of risk of malignancy indices; RMI 1-4 in borderline ovarian tumor.
    Yenen MC; Alanbay I; Aktürk E; Ercan CM; Coksuer H; Karaşahin E; Ozan H; Dede M
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2012; 33(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 22611957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk of malignancy index in the preoperative evaluation of patients with adnexal masses.
    Andersen ES; Knudsen A; Rix P; Johansen B
    Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Jul; 90(1):109-12. PubMed ID: 12821350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The accuracy of risk malignancy index in prediction of malignancy in women with adnexal mass in Basrah, Iraq.
    Al-Asadi JN; Al-Maliki SK; Al-Dahhhan F; Al-Naama L; Suood F
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1254-1259. PubMed ID: 30297555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules and the risk of malignancy index to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Auekitrungrueng R; Tinnangwattana D; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenratana C; Lerthiranwong T; Wanapirak C; Tongsong T
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 146(3):364-369. PubMed ID: 31206642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ovarian fibroma/fibrothecoma: retrospective cohort study shows limited value of risk of malignancy index score.
    Numanoglu C; Kuru O; Sakinci M; Akbayır O; Ulker V
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Jun; 53(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 23611791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Should cut-off values of the risk of malignancy index be changed for evaluation of adnexal masses in Asian and Pacific populations?
    Yavuzcan A; Caglar M; Ozgu E; Ustun Y; Dilbaz S; Ozdemir I; Yildiz E; Gungor T; Kumru S
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(9):5455-9. PubMed ID: 24175841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.