These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21824790)
1. Measuring strategic control in artificial grammar learning. Norman E; Price MC; Jones E Conscious Cogn; 2011 Dec; 20(4):1920-9. PubMed ID: 21824790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The relationship between strategic control and conscious structural knowledge in artificial grammar learning. Norman E; Scott RB; Price MC; Dienes Z Conscious Cogn; 2016 May; 42():229-236. PubMed ID: 27055066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intentional control based on familiarity in artificial grammar learning. Wan L; Dienes Z; Fu X Conscious Cogn; 2008 Dec; 17(4):1209-18. PubMed ID: 18667335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implicit learning of conjunctive rule sets: an alternative to artificial grammars. Neil GJ; Higham PA Conscious Cogn; 2012 Sep; 21(3):1393-400. PubMed ID: 22871460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Abstractionist and processing accounts of implicit learning. Johnstone T; Shanks DR Cogn Psychol; 2001 Feb; 42(1):61-112. PubMed ID: 11161417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fluency does not express implicit knowledge of artificial grammars. Scott RB; Dienes Z Cognition; 2010 Mar; 114(3):372-88. PubMed ID: 19932473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Concurrence of rule- and similarity-based mechanisms in artificial grammar learning. Opitz B; Hofmann J Cogn Psychol; 2015 Mar; 77():77-99. PubMed ID: 25767052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Role of Simple Semantics in the Process of Artificial Grammar Learning. Öttl B; Jäger G; Kaup B J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Oct; 46(5):1285-1308. PubMed ID: 28484966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of prior knowledge in implicit and explicit learning of artificial grammars. Ziori E; Pothos EM; Dienes Z Conscious Cogn; 2014 Aug; 28():1-16. PubMed ID: 24999179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Age affects chunk-based, but not rule-based learning in artificial grammar acquisition. Kürten J; De Vries MH; Kowal K; Zwitserlood P; Flöel A Neurobiol Aging; 2012 Jul; 33(7):1311-7. PubMed ID: 21093109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Instruction effects in implicit artificial grammar learning: a preference for grammaticality. Forkstam C; Elwér A; Ingvar M; Petersson KM Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1221():80-92. PubMed ID: 18561897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The conscious, the unconscious, and familiarity. Scott RB; Dienes Z J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1264-88. PubMed ID: 18763904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Violations of implicit rules elicit an early negativity in the event-related potential. Schankin A; Hagemann D; Danner D; Hager M Neuroreport; 2011 Sep; 22(13):642-5. PubMed ID: 21817929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiple regression analyses in artificial-grammar learning: the importance of control groups. Lotz A; Kinder A; Lachnit H Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Mar; 62(3):576-84. PubMed ID: 18609384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Separate influences in learning: evidence from artificial grammar learning with traumatic brain injury patients. Pothos EM; Wood RL Brain Res; 2009 Jun; 1275():67-72. PubMed ID: 19389386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]