These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21824842)

  • 1. Removal of spurious coherence in MEG source-space coherence analysis.
    Sekihara K; Owen JP; Trisno S; Nagarajan SS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Nov; 58(11):3121-9. PubMed ID: 21824842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Residual coherence and residual envelope correlation in MEG/EEG source-space connectivity analysis.
    Sekihara K; Nagarajan SS
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():4414-7. PubMed ID: 24110712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
    Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
    Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of the head model on EEG and MEG source connectivity analyses.
    Cho JH; Vorwerk J; Wolters CH; Knösche TR
    Neuroimage; 2015 Apr; 110():60-77. PubMed ID: 25638756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating functional connectivity using 2D tangential components in MEG sensor space.
    Kim MY; Kwon H; Lim S; Lee YH; Kim JW; Kim K
    J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Jan; 257():64-75. PubMed ID: 26393280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hyperedge bundling: A practical solution to spurious interactions in MEG/EEG source connectivity analyses.
    Wang SH; Lobier M; Siebenhühner F; Puoliväli T; Palva S; Palva JM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jun; 173():610-622. PubMed ID: 29378318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring functional connectivity using MEG: methodology and comparison with fcMRI.
    Brookes MJ; Hale JR; Zumer JM; Stevenson CM; Francis ST; Barnes GR; Owen JP; Morris PG; Nagarajan SS
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jun; 56(3):1082-104. PubMed ID: 21352925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
    Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phase shift invariant imaging of coherent sources (PSIICOS) from MEG data.
    Ossadtchi A; Altukhov D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():950-971. PubMed ID: 30142449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Source-space ICA for MEG source imaging.
    Jonmohamadi Y; Jones RD
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Feb; 13(1):016005. PubMed ID: 26644284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new wavelet transform to sparsely represent cortical current densities for EEG/MEG inverse problems.
    Liao K; Zhu M; Ding L
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Aug; 111(2):376-88. PubMed ID: 23706527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MEG source imaging method using fast L1 minimum-norm and its applications to signals with brain noise and human resting-state source amplitude images.
    Huang MX; Huang CW; Robb A; Angeles A; Nichols SL; Baker DG; Song T; Harrington DL; Theilmann RJ; Srinivasan R; Heister D; Diwakar M; Canive JM; Edgar JC; Chen YH; Ji Z; Shen M; El-Gabalawy F; Levy M; McLay R; Webb-Murphy J; Liu TT; Drake A; Lee RR
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():585-604. PubMed ID: 24055704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robust EEG/MEG Based Functional Connectivity with the Envelope of the Imaginary Coherence: Sensor Space Analysis.
    Sanchez Bornot JM; Wong-Lin K; Ahmad AL; Prasad G
    Brain Topogr; 2018 Nov; 31(6):895-916. PubMed ID: 29546509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Localizing true brain interactions from EEG and MEG data with subspace methods and modified beamformers.
    Shahbazi Avarvand F; Ewald A; Nolte G
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2012; 2012():402341. PubMed ID: 22919429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accurate reconstruction of brain activity and functional connectivity from noisy MEG data.
    Owen JP; Wipf DP; Attias HT; Sekihara K; Nagarajan SS
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():65-8. PubMed ID: 19965115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A hierarchical Bayesian method to resolve an inverse problem of MEG contaminated with eye movement artifacts.
    Fujiwara Y; Yamashita O; Kawawaki D; Doya K; Kawato M; Toyama K; Sato MA
    Neuroimage; 2009 Apr; 45(2):393-409. PubMed ID: 19150653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigation of EEG and MEG source imaging accuracy in reconstructing extended cortical sources.
    Ding L; Yuan H
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():7013-6. PubMed ID: 22255953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ghost interactions in MEG/EEG source space: A note of caution on inter-areal coupling measures.
    Palva JM; Wang SH; Palva S; Zhigalov A; Monto S; Brookes MJ; Schoffelen JM; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jun; 173():632-643. PubMed ID: 29477441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Random location of multiple sparse priors for solving the MEG/EEG inverse problem.
    Lopez JD; Espinosa JJ; Barnes GR
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():1534-7. PubMed ID: 23366195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.