These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21824986)

  • 21. Use of MRF residue as alternative fuel in cement production.
    Fyffe JR; Breckel AC; Townsend AK; Webber ME
    Waste Manag; 2016 Jan; 47(Pt B):276-84. PubMed ID: 26187294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of fuel value and combustion characteristics of two different RDF samples.
    Sever Akdağ A; Atımtay A; Sanin FD
    Waste Manag; 2016 Jan; 47(Pt B):217-24. PubMed ID: 26360232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The application of SRF vs. RDF classification and specifications to the material flows of two mechanical-biological treatment plants of Rome: Comparison and implications.
    Di Lonardo MC; Franzese M; Costa G; Gavasci R; Lombardi F
    Waste Manag; 2016 Jan; 47(Pt B):195-205. PubMed ID: 26243051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Co-combustion of solid recovered fuels in coal-fired power plants.
    Thiel S; Thomé-Kozmiensky KJ
    Waste Manag Res; 2012 Apr; 30(4):392-403. PubMed ID: 22143900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Thermovalorization: new technologies, impacts and mitigation strategies].
    Buffoli M; Capolongo S; Loconte VL; Signorelli C
    Ann Ig; 2012; 24(2):167-78. PubMed ID: 22755503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Regional shipping strategy assessment based on installing a refuse-derived-fuel process in a municipal incinerator.
    Chang YH; Chang NB
    Waste Manag Res; 2001 Dec; 19(6):504-17. PubMed ID: 12201680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Analysis of potential RDF resources from solid waste and their energy values in the largest industrial city of Korea.
    Dong TT; Lee BK
    Waste Manag; 2009 May; 29(5):1725-31. PubMed ID: 19136242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Production, quality and quality assurance of Refuse Derived Fuels (RDFs).
    Sarc R; Lorber KE
    Waste Manag; 2013 Sep; 33(9):1825-34. PubMed ID: 23746983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Municipal solid waste incineration in China and the issue of acidification: A review.
    Ji L; Lu S; Yang J; Du C; Chen Z; Buekens A; Yan J
    Waste Manag Res; 2016 Apr; 34(4):280-97. PubMed ID: 26941208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Technical potential of electricity production from municipal solid waste disposed in the biggest cities in Brazil: landfill gas, biogas and thermal treatment.
    de Souza SN; Horttanainen M; Antonelli J; Klaus O; Lindino CA; Nogueira CE
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Oct; 32(10):1015-23. PubMed ID: 25323146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Technical assessment of the CLEERGAS moving grate-based process for energy generation from municipal solid waste.
    Lusardi MR; Kohn M; Themelis NJ; Castaldi MJ
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Aug; 32(8):772-81. PubMed ID: 25096323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A review on technological options of waste to energy for effective management of municipal solid waste.
    Kumar A; Samadder SR
    Waste Manag; 2017 Nov; 69():407-422. PubMed ID: 28886975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. CCA-treated wood disposed in landfills and life-cycle trade-offs with waste-to-energy and MSW landfill disposal.
    Jambeck J; Weitz K; Solo-Gabriele H; Townsend T; Thorneloe S
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(8):S21-8. PubMed ID: 17416510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A review of technologies and performances of thermal treatment systems for energy recovery from waste.
    Lombardi L; Carnevale E; Corti A
    Waste Manag; 2015 Mar; 37():26-44. PubMed ID: 25535103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The environmental comparison of landfilling vs. incineration of MSW accounting for waste diversion.
    Assamoi B; Lawryshyn Y
    Waste Manag; 2012 May; 32(5):1019-30. PubMed ID: 22099926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Economic analysis of waste-to-energy industry in China.
    Zhao XG; Jiang GW; Li A; Wang L
    Waste Manag; 2016 Feb; 48():604-618. PubMed ID: 26514312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of the environmental sustainability of different waste-to-energy plant configurations.
    Lombardi L; Carnevale EA
    Waste Manag; 2018 Mar; 73():232-246. PubMed ID: 28728789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An integrated analytical framework for quantifying the LCOE of waste-to-energy facilities for a range of greenhouse gas emissions policy and technical factors.
    Townsend AK; Webber ME
    Waste Manag; 2012 Jul; 32(7):1366-77. PubMed ID: 22425189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Technology of waste incineration].
    Thömen KH
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B; 1983 Sep; 178(1-2):174-85. PubMed ID: 6649993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. New techniques for the characterization of refuse-derived fuels and solid recovered fuels.
    Rotter VS; Lehmann A; Marzi T; Möhle E; Schingnitz D; Hoffmann G
    Waste Manag Res; 2011 Feb; 29(2):229-36. PubMed ID: 20392788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.