These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21825111)

  • 1. Assessing youth who sexually offended: the predictive validity of the ERASOR, J-SOAP-II, and YLS/CMI in a non-Western context.
    Chu CM; Ng K; Fong J; Teoh J
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Apr; 24(2):153-74. PubMed ID: 21825111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing protective factors of youth who sexually offended in singapore: preliminary evidence on the utility of the DASH-13 and the SAPROF.
    Zeng G; Chu CM; Lee Y
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Feb; 27(1):91-108. PubMed ID: 25527632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity of Risk Assessment Instruments Among Juveniles Who Sexually Offended: Victim Age Matters.
    Krause C; Roth A; Landolt MA; Bessler C; Aebi M
    Sex Abuse; 2021 Jun; 33(4):379-405. PubMed ID: 32172652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing the validity of criminal risk assessment tools in sexually abusive youth.
    Barra S; Bessler C; Landolt MA; Aebi M
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Nov; 30(11):1430-1443. PubMed ID: 29792506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity and Reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Youth Sexual Offense Version.
    Rojas EY; Olver ME
    Sex Abuse; 2020 Oct; 32(7):826-849. PubMed ID: 31248327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing youth offenders in a non-Western context: The predictive validity of the YLS/CMI ratings.
    Chu CM; Lee Y; Zeng G; Yim G; Tan CY; Ang Y; Chin S; Ruby K
    Psychol Assess; 2015 Sep; 27(3):1013-21. PubMed ID: 25602694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A prospective investigation of factors that predict desistance from recidivism for adolescents who have sexually offended.
    Worling JR; Langton CM
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Feb; 27(1):127-42. PubMed ID: 25201880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective validity of the Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR).
    Worling JR; Bookalam D; Litteljohn A
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Jun; 24(3):203-23. PubMed ID: 21969313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-Term Predictive Validity of the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-II: Research and Practice Implications.
    Schwartz-Mette RA; Righthand S; Hecker J; Dore G; Huff R
    Sex Abuse; 2020 Aug; 32(5):499-520. PubMed ID: 30714853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting sexual and nonsexual recidivism in a consecutive sample of juveniles convicted of sexual offences.
    Aebi M; Plattner B; Steinhausen HC; Bessler C
    Sex Abuse; 2011 Dec; 23(4):456-73. PubMed ID: 21406605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-II in an Australian Context.
    Molnar T; Allard T; McKillop N; Rynne J
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2022 Aug; 66(10-11):1051-1070. PubMed ID: 31957511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Predictive Validity of Savry Ratings for Assessing Youth Offenders in Singapore: A Comparison With YLS/CMI Ratings.
    Chu CM; Goh ML; Chong D
    Crim Justice Behav; 2016 Jun; 43(6):793-810. PubMed ID: 27231403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and Validation of the Juvenile Sexual Offense Recidivism Risk Assessment Tool-II.
    Epperson DL; Ralston CA
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Dec; 27(6):529-58. PubMed ID: 24492618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk and protective factors for recidivism among juveniles who have offended sexually.
    Spice A; Viljoen JL; Latzman NE; Scalora MJ; Ullman D
    Sex Abuse; 2013 Aug; 25(4):347-69. PubMed ID: 23033066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Utility of the YLS/CMI-SV for Assessing Youth Offenders in Singapore.
    Chu CM; Yu H; Lee Y; Zeng G
    Crim Justice Behav; 2014 Dec; 41(12):1437-1457. PubMed ID: 25983353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Protective factors and recidivism in accused juveniles who sexually offended.
    Klein V; Rettenberger M; Yoon D; Köhler N; Briken P
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Feb; 27(1):71-90. PubMed ID: 25351199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlates of recidivism among adolescents who have sexually offended.
    Carpentier J; Proulx J
    Sex Abuse; 2011 Dec; 23(4):434-55. PubMed ID: 21960517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of the YLS/CMI on an Australian Juvenile Offending Population.
    Dellar K; Roberts L; Bullen J; Downe K; Kane R
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2023 Jun; 67(8):861-883. PubMed ID: 35414291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Review of risk assessment instruments for juvenile sex offenders: what is next?
    Hempel I; Buck N; Cima M; van Marle H
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2013 Feb; 57(2):208-28. PubMed ID: 22147101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sex offender registration and recidivism risk in juvenile sexual offenders.
    Caldwell MF; Dickinson C
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(6):941-56. PubMed ID: 19937920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.