These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21826552)

  • 21. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Temporal processing ability is related to ear-asymmetry for detecting time cues in sound: a mismatch negativity (MMN) study.
    Todd J; Finch B; Smith E; Budd TW; Schall U
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 21040739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Action-induced effects on perception depend neither on element-level nor on set-level similarity between stimulus and response sets.
    Wykowska A; Hommel B; Schubö A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1034-41. PubMed ID: 21472508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Congruency of auditory sounds and visual letters modulates mismatch negativity and P300 event-related potentials.
    Andres AJ; Oram Cardy JE; Joanisse MF
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Feb; 79(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 20888870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. When sound affects vision: effects of auditory grouping on visual motion perception.
    Watanabe K; Shimojo S
    Psychol Sci; 2001 Mar; 12(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 11340918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Trial after trial: general processing consequences as a function of repetition and change in multidimensional sound.
    Dyson BJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Sep; 63(9):1770-88. PubMed ID: 20169505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Processing multidimensional objects under different perceptual loads: the priority of bottom-up perceptual saliency.
    Wei P; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 16935270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Looming sounds as warning signals: the function of motion cues.
    Bach DR; Neuhoff JG; Perrig W; Seifritz E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Oct; 74(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 19615414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of pictorial depth information on projected size judgments.
    Farran EK; Whitaker A; Patel N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):207-14. PubMed ID: 19304611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Redundancy effects of a moving distractor generated by alerting and orienting.
    Utochkin IS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1825-30. PubMed ID: 19933565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Audiovisual bounce-inducing effect: when sound congruence affects grouping in vision.
    Grassi M; Casco C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):378-86. PubMed ID: 20139453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cross-modal emotional attention: emotional voices modulate early stages of visual processing.
    Brosch T; Grandjean D; Sander D; Scherer KR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Sep; 21(9):1670-9. PubMed ID: 18767920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Auditory emotional cues enhance visual perception.
    Zeelenberg R; Bocanegra BR
    Cognition; 2010 Apr; 115(1):202-6. PubMed ID: 20096407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Auditory, tactile, and multisensory cues facilitate search for dynamic visual stimuli.
    Ngo MK; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1654-65. PubMed ID: 20675808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Two components in IOR: evidence for response bias and perceptual processing delays using the SAT methodology.
    Zhao Y; Heinke D; Ivanoff J; Klein RM; Humphreys GW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2143-59. PubMed ID: 21789695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Combined effects of perceptual grouping cues on object representation: evidence from motion-induced blindness.
    Shibata M; Kawachi Y; Gyoba J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):387-97. PubMed ID: 20139454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cross-modal interactions between audition, touch, and vision in endogenous spatial attention: ERP evidence on preparatory states and sensory modulations.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Feb; 14(2):254-71. PubMed ID: 11970790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dynamics of within-, inter-, and cross-modal attentional modulation.
    Kida T; Inui K; Tanaka E; Kakigi R
    J Neurophysiol; 2011 Feb; 105(2):674-86. PubMed ID: 21148089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Auditory and visual attention-based apparent motion share functional parallels.
    Huddleston WE; Lewis JW; Phinney RE; DeYoe EA
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Oct; 70(7):1207-16. PubMed ID: 18927004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.