1013 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21826879)
1. Residual prostatic tumour in the surgical bed following radical prostatectomy in organ-confined prostate cancer: possible prognostic significance.
Valotto C; Falconieri G; Pizzolitto S; Cerruto MA; Brondani G; De Gobbi A; Zattoni F
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2011 Jun; 83(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 21826879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical and pathological characteristics of patients presenting with biochemical progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy for pathologically organ-confined prostate cancer.
Pinto F; Prayer-Galetti T; Gardiman M; Sacco E; Ciaccia M; Fracalanza S; Betto G; Pagano F
Urol Int; 2006; 76(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 16601379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Percentage of cancer in prostate biopsies as prognostic factor for staging and postoperative biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
Villamón-Fort R; Martínez-Jabaloyas JM; Soriano-Sarriá P; Ramos-Soler D; Pastor-Hernández F; Gil-Salom M
Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):328-33. PubMed ID: 17495491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.
Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Suh J; Macklis R; Klein E
Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 9099457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The presence of benign prostatic glandular tissue at surgical margins does not predict PSA recurrence.
Kernek KM; Koch MO; Daggy JK; Juliar BE; Cheng L
J Clin Pathol; 2005 Jul; 58(7):725-8. PubMed ID: 15976340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk factors of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence of patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a single-center 10-year report.
Li K; Li H; Yang Y; Ian LH; Pun WH; Ho SF
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Apr; 124(7):1001-5. PubMed ID: 21542957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Early prostate-specific antigen relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy: prediction on the basis of preoperative and postoperative tumor characteristics.
Graefen M; Noldus J; Pichlmeier U; Haese A; Hammerer P; Fernandez S; Conrad S; Henke R; Huland E; Huland H
Eur Urol; 1999; 36(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 10364651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy.
Blute ML; Bostwick DG; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak JM; Martin SK; Amling CL; Zincke H
Urology; 1997 Nov; 50(5):733-9. PubMed ID: 9372884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation of clinical and pathologic factors with rising prostate-specific antigen profiles after radical prostatectomy alone for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Klein E
Urology; 1996 Aug; 48(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 8753737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Presence or absence of a positive pathological margin outperforms any other margin-associated variable in predicting clinically relevant biochemical recurrence in Gleason 7 prostate cancer.
Huang JG; Pedersen J; Hong MK; Harewood LM; Peters J; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Corcoran NM
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 23350712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical significance of benign glands at surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy specimens.
Kohl SK; Balaji KC; Smith LM; Wilson NP; Johansson SL; Sterrett SP; Abrahams NA
Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1112-6. PubMed ID: 17572197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radical prostatectomy for incidental (stage T1a-T1b) prostate cancer: analysis of predictors for residual disease and biochemical recurrence.
Capitanio U; Scattoni V; Freschi M; Briganti A; Salonia A; Gallina A; Colombo R; Karakiewicz PI; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
Eur Urol; 2008 Jul; 54(1):118-25. PubMed ID: 18314255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Percent of cores positive for cancer is a better preoperative predictor of cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy than prostate specific antigen.
San Francisco IF; Regan MM; Olumi AF; DeWolf WC
J Urol; 2004 Apr; 171(4):1492-9. PubMed ID: 15017206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The actual value of the surgical margin status as a predictor of disease progression in men with early prostate cancer.
Vis AN; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
Eur Urol; 2006 Aug; 50(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 16413660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term follow-up of a neoadjuvant chemohormonal taxane-based phase II trial before radical prostatectomy in patients with non-metastatic high-risk prostate cancer.
Prayer-Galetti T; Sacco E; Pagano F; Gardiman M; Cisternino A; Betto G; Sperandio P
BJU Int; 2007 Aug; 100(2):274-80. PubMed ID: 17355369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does capsular incision at radical retropubic prostatectomy affect disease-free survival in otherwise organ-confined prostate cancer?
Barocas DA; Han M; Epstein JI; Chan DY; Trock BJ; Walsh PC; Partin AW
Urology; 2001 Nov; 58(5):746-51. PubMed ID: 11711353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
