115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21827051)
1. A comparative analysis of adhesive resin removal methods.
Schiefelbein C; Rowland K
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(2):17-22. PubMed ID: 21827051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of resin-removal methods on enamel and shear bond strength of rebonded brackets.
Eminkahyagil N; Arman A; Cetinşahin A; Karabulut E
Angle Orthod; 2006 Mar; 76(2):314-21. PubMed ID: 16539561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enamel surface morphology after bracket debonding.
Osorio R; Toledano M; García-Godoy F
ASDC J Dent Child; 1998; 65(5):313-7, 354. PubMed ID: 9795734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An in vitro investigation of the effectiveness of bioactive glass air-abrasion in the 'selective' removal of orthodontic resin adhesive.
Banerjee A; Paolinelis G; Socker M; McDonald F; Watson TF
Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Oct; 116(5):488-92. PubMed ID: 18821993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Enamel surface evaluation after bracket debonding and different resin removal methods.
Vidor MM; Felix RP; Marchioro EM; Hahn L
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 25992989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements.
Krell KV; Courey JM; Bishara SE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Mar; 103(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 8456784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of different debonding techniques on the enamel surface: an in vitro qualitative study.
Zarrinnia K; Eid NM; Kehoe MJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):284-93. PubMed ID: 7661146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rebonding of orthodontic brackets. Part II, an XPS and SEM study.
Montasser MA; Drummond JL; Roth JR; Al-Turki L; Evans CA
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):537-44. PubMed ID: 18416615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Removal of Invisalign retention attachments: a new minimally invasive method.
Ruiz JL; Finger WJ; Sasazaki H; Komatsu M
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2009; 30(9):634-6, 638, 640 passim. PubMed ID: 19998730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket debonding.
Cardoso LA; Valdrighi HC; Vedovello Filho M; Correr AB
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(6):105-12. PubMed ID: 25628087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enamel cracks and ceramic bracket failure during debonding in vitro.
Bishara SE; Ostby AW; Laffoon J; Warren JJ
Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1078-83. PubMed ID: 18947289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stereomicroscope analysis of enamel surface after orthodontic bracket debonding.
Miksić M; Slaj M; Mestrović S
Coll Antropol; 2003; 27 Suppl 2():83-9. PubMed ID: 12971175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization and in vitro estrogenicity of orthodontic adhesive particulates produced by simulated debonding.
Gioka C; Eliades T; Zinelis S; Pratsinis H; Athanasiou AE; Eliades G; Kletsas D
Dent Mater; 2009 Mar; 25(3):376-82. PubMed ID: 18835638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of enamel roughness after orthodontic debonding and clean-up procedures using zirconia, tungsten carbide, and white stone burs: an in vitro study.
Thawaba AA; Albelasy NF; Elsherbini AM; Hafez AM
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):478. PubMed ID: 37443027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Debonding of ceramic brackets by a new scanning laser method.
Oztoprak MO; Nalbantgil D; Erdem AS; Tozlu M; Arun T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 20691361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Re: Effect of resin-removal methods on enamel and shear bond strength of rebonded brackets.
Campbell PM
Angle Orthod; 2006 Nov; 76(6):i; author reply i-ii. PubMed ID: 17120353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Enamel Surface Roughness after Bracket Debonding and Adhesive Resin Removal Using Different Burs with and without the Aid of a Magnifying Loupe.
Thawaba AA; Albelasy NF; Elsherbini AM; Hafez AM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Nov; 23(11):1091-1099. PubMed ID: 37073931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods.
Elekdag-Turk S; Isci D; Ozkalayci N; Turk T
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 19164413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patients' report of discomfort and pain during debonding of orthodontic brackets: a comparative study of two methods.
Normando TS; Calçada FS; Ursi WJ; Normando D
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e29-34. PubMed ID: 21490985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
