BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21827051)

  • 21. Enamel surface evaluation after removal of orthodontic composite remnants by intraoral sandblasting: a 3-dimensional surface profilometry study.
    Kim SS; Park WK; Son WS; Ahn HS; Ro JH; Kim YD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 17628253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of different splint removal techniques on the surface roughness of human enamel: a three-dimensional optical profilometry analysis.
    Cehreli ZC; Lakshmipathy M; Yazici R
    Dent Traumatol; 2008 Apr; 24(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 18352920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In-vitro study of the effect of casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium fluoride phosphate on iatrogenic damage to enamel during orthodontic adhesive removal.
    Mayne RJ; Cochrane NJ; Cai F; Woods MG; Reynolds EC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):e543-51. PubMed ID: 21640866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative SEM studies of the enamel surface appearance following the use of glass ionomer cement and a diacrylate resin for bracket bonding.
    Ostman-Andersson E; Marcusson A; Hörstedt P
    Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(4):139-46. PubMed ID: 8236031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impulse debracketing compared to conventional debonding.
    Knösel M; Mattysek S; Jung K; Sadat-Khonsari R; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Bauss O; Ziebolz D
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Nov; 80(6):1036-44. PubMed ID: 20677952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ceramic bracket debonding: the evaluation of two debonding techniques and their effect on enamel.
    Amditis C
    Aust Orthod J; 1994 Mar; 13(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 7993241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of enamel surface roughness after orthodontic bracket debonding with atomic force microscopy.
    Mohebi S; Shafiee HA; Ameli N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):521-527. PubMed ID: 28257737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bracket bonding with 15- or 60-second etching and adhesive remaining on enamel after debonding.
    Osorio R; Toledano M; Garcia-Godoy F
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 10022184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparative study of qualitative and quantitative methods for the assessment of adhesive remnant after bracket debonding.
    Cehreli SB; Polat-Ozsoy O; Sar C; Cubukcu HE; Cehreli ZC
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):188-92. PubMed ID: 21262932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of oxygen inhibition in indirect bonding with a hydrophilic adhesive.
    Soo PP; Green BM; Sondhi A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):214-21. PubMed ID: 19201329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bond strengths and debonding characteristics of two types of polycrystalline ceramic brackets.
    Lemke K; Xu X; Hagan JL; Armbruster PC; Ballard RW
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 21175022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bond strength and debonding characteristics of a new ceramic bracket.
    Liu JK; Chung CH; Chang CY; Shieh DB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):761-5; quiz 802. PubMed ID: 16360918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Enamel surfaces after orthodontic bracket debonding.
    Campbell PM
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 7785800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of different debonding techniques on the debonding forces and failure modes of ceramic brackets in simulated clinical set-ups.
    Chen HY; Su MZ; Chang HF; Chen YJ; Lan WH; Lin CP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):680-6. PubMed ID: 18005844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Enamel surface roughness following debonding using two resin grinding methods.
    Eliades T; Gioka C; Eliades G; Makou M
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Jun; 26(3):333-8. PubMed ID: 15222720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Removal of orthodontic bonding resin residues by CO2 laser radiation: surface effects.
    Smith SC; Walsh LJ; Taverne AA
    J Clin Laser Med Surg; 1999 Feb; 17(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 10204443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization.
    Ozcan M; Finnema K; Ybema A
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 18209212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effects of bracket removal on enamel.
    Heravi F; Rashed R; Raziee L
    Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19113075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of debonding force direction on orthodontic shear bond strength.
    Klocke A; Kahl-Nieke B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Feb; 129(2):261-5. PubMed ID: 16473719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.