These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21827051)

  • 41. Failure analysis: enamel fracture after debonding orthodontic brackets.
    Chen CS; Hsu ML; Chang KD; Kuang SH; Chen PT; Gung YW
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1071-7. PubMed ID: 18947273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Bond strength evaluation of ceramic and stainless steel bracket bases subjected to cyclic tensile loading.
    Soderquist SA; Drummond JL; Evans CA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Feb; 129(2):175.e7-175.e12. PubMed ID: 16473707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Elemental analytical and quantitative morphometric determination of the synthetic resin residues and enamel avulsion after the removal of metal brackets].
    Ruppenthal T; Stratmann U; Sergl HG; Czech D
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1992 Apr; 53(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 1577351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Laser debonding of ceramic brackets: a comprehensive review.
    Azzeh E; Feldon PJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jan; 123(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 12532067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Clinical evaluations on thermal versus mechanical debonding of ceramic brackets.
    Kraut J; Radin S; Trowbridge HI; Emling RC; Yankell SL
    J Clin Dent; 1991; 2(4):92-6. PubMed ID: 1812905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Enamel damage depending on the method of bracket removal].
    Fischer-Brandies H; Kremers L; Reicheneder C; Kluge G; Hüsler K
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1993 Apr; 54(2):64-70. PubMed ID: 8495948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel: an in-vitro study.
    Habibi M; Nik TH; Hooshmand T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):675-9. PubMed ID: 18005843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Enamel loss associated with orthodontic adhesive removal on teeth with white spot lesions: an in vitro study.
    Tüfekçi E; Merrill TE; Pintado MR; Beyer JP; Brantley WA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jun; 125(6):733-9. PubMed ID: 15179398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Debonding forces applied to ceramic brackets simulating clinical conditions.
    Bishara SE; Forrseca JM; Fehr DE; Boyer DB
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 7978522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of buccal versus lingual surfaces, enamel conditioning procedures and storage duration on brackets debonding characteristics.
    Brosh T; Strouthou S; Sarne O
    J Dent; 2005 Feb; 33(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15683890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of enamel surface roughness and color alteration after bracket debonding and polishing with 2 systems: A split-mouth clinical trial.
    Pinzan-Vercelino CRM; Souza Costa AC; Gurgel JA; Salvatore Freitas KM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Nov; 160(5):686-694. PubMed ID: 34332796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Influence of a nonrinse conditioner on the bond strength of brackets bonded with a resin adhesive system.
    Vicente A; Bravo LA; Romero M
    Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):400-5. PubMed ID: 15898380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Ceramic bracket debonding by Tm:YAP laser irradiation.
    Dostalova T; Jelinkova H; Sulc J; Nemec M; Jelinek M; Fibrich M; Michalik P; Miyagi M; Seydlova M
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2011 Jul; 29(7):477-84. PubMed ID: 21332377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of a composite resin orthodontic adhesive.
    Bishara SE; VonWald L; Laffoon JF; Warren JJ
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Dec; 70(6):435-41. PubMed ID: 11138647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Shear/peel bond strength of repositioned ceramic brackets.
    Gaffey PG; Major PW; Glover K; Grace M; Koehler JR
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(5):351-7. PubMed ID: 8526294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Bond strength of 4 orthodontic adhesives used with a caries-protective resin sealant.
    Lowder PD; Foley T; Banting DW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 18675212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Enamel loss at bond-up, debond and clean-up following the use of a conventional light-cured composite and a resin-modified glass polyalkenoate cement.
    Ireland AJ; Hosein I; Sherriff M
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 16043478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Enamel cracks: influence of orthodontic process].
    Bernard-Granger C; Gebeile-Chauty S
    Orthod Fr; 2014 Sep; 85(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 25158747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Enamel scarring by debonding burs: an SEM and profilometric study.
    Mahdavie NN; Manasse RJ; Viana G; Evans CA; Bedran-Russo AB
    J Clin Orthod; 2014 Jan; 48(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 24622621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Three-dimensional measurement of residual adhesive and enamel loss on teeth after debonding of orthodontic brackets: an in-vitro study.
    Al Shamsi AH; Cunningham JL; Lamey PJ; Lynch E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Mar; 131(3):301.e9-15. PubMed ID: 17346580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.