These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21827523)

  • 1. Composite vertical bite reconstructions in eroded dentitions after 5·5 years: a case series.
    Attin T; Filli T; Imfeld C; Schmidlin PR
    J Oral Rehabil; 2012 Jan; 39(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 21827523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-year evaluation of posterior vertical bite reconstruction using direct resin composite--a case series.
    Schmidlin PR; Filli T; Imfeld C; Tepper S; Attin T
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 19192844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Posterior Vertical Bite Reconstructions of Erosively Worn Dentitions and the "Stamp Technique" - A Case Series with a Mean Observation Time of 40 Months.
    Ramseyer ST; Helbling C; Lussi A
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Jun; 17(3):283-9. PubMed ID: 26159125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and two polyacid-modified resin composites in cervical lesions restorations: 1-year follow-up.
    Chinelatti MA; Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Palma-Dibb RG
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 31(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 15025658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
    Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the mechanical and physical properties of a posterior resin composite in posterior adult teeth.
    Agbaje LO; Shaba OP; Adegbulugbe IC
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2010 Dec; 13(4):431-5. PubMed ID: 21220860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implementation and experience of a new method for posterior vertical bite reconstruction using direct resin composite restorations in the private practice--a survey.
    Tauböck TT; Attin T; Schmidlin PR
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2012 Jul; 70(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 21793644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The evaluation of direct composite restorations for the worn mandibular anterior dentition - clinical performance and patient satisfaction.
    Poyser NJ; Briggs PF; Chana HS; Kelleher MG; Porter RW; Patel MM
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 May; 34(5):361-76. PubMed ID: 17441877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of two packable resin-based composite restorations: a three-year report.
    Torres CR; Borges AB; Goncalves SE; Pucci CR; de Araujo MA; Barcellos DC
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(4):338-43. PubMed ID: 20591781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-year follow-up of fractured anterior teeth restored with direct composite resin: report of three cases.
    Ozel E; Kazandag MK; Soyman M; Bayirli G
    Dent Traumatol; 2008 Oct; 24(5):589-92. PubMed ID: 18821971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-year clinical evaluation of repair versus replacement of composite restorations.
    Gordan VV; Shen C; Riley J; Mjör IA
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(3):144-53; discussion 154. PubMed ID: 16831187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An up to 3-year randomized clinical study comparing indirect and direct resin composites used to restore worn posterior teeth.
    Bartlett D; Sundaram G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(6):613-7. PubMed ID: 17165303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of conventional versus colored compomers for class II restorations in primary molars: a 12-month clinical study.
    Ertugrul F; Cogulu D; Ozdemir Y; Ersin N
    Med Princ Pract; 2010; 19(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 20134179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for a period of 3 years.
    Türkün LS; Türkün M; Ozata F
    Quintessence Int; 2005 May; 36(5):365-72. PubMed ID: 15892534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of resin viscosity and enamel beveling on the clinical performance of Class V composite restorations: three-year results.
    Baratieri LN; Canabarro S; Lopes GC; Ritter AV
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):482-7. PubMed ID: 14531591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. One-year clinical evaluation of two resin composites, two polymerization methods, and a resin-modified glass ionomer in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Koubi S; Raskin A; Bukiet F; Pignoly C; Toca E; Tassery H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):42-53. PubMed ID: 17091139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(5):256-65; discussion 266-7. PubMed ID: 16987320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations in endodontically treated teeth.
    Can Say E; Kayahan B; Ozel E; Gokce K; Soyman M; Bayirli G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 May; 7(2):17-25. PubMed ID: 16685291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of direct esthetic restorations in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions: one-year results.
    Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Sep; 22(9):687-92. PubMed ID: 1835107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.