These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21828900)

  • 1. Evaluation of multiple-sphere head models for MEG source localization.
    Lalancette M; Quraan M; Cheyne D
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 56(17):5621-35. PubMed ID: 21828900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The 3D topography of MEG source localization accuracy: effects of conductor model and noise.
    Tarkiainen A; Liljeström M; Seppä M; Salmelin R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Oct; 114(10):1977-92. PubMed ID: 14499760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of three-shell and simplified volume conductor models in magnetoencephalography.
    Stenroos M; Hunold A; Haueisen J
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jul; 94():337-348. PubMed ID: 24434678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
    Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity of beamformer source analysis to deficiencies in forward modeling.
    Steinsträter O; Sillekens S; Junghoefer M; Burger M; Wolters CH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2010 Dec; 31(12):1907-27. PubMed ID: 21086549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of dipole reconstruction accuracy with spherical and realistic head models in MEG.
    Crouzeix A; Yvert B; Bertrand O; Pernier J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Dec; 110(12):2176-88. PubMed ID: 10616124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The magnetic field inside special conducting geometries due to internal current.
    Heller L; Ranken D; Best E
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Aug; 51(8):1310-8. PubMed ID: 15311815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of head tissue conductivity in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models.
    Van Uitert R; Johnson C; Zhukov L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2129-37. PubMed ID: 15605860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of MEG source imaging of anterior temporal spikes: analysis of an intracranially characterized spike focus.
    Wennberg R; Cheyne D
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 May; 125(5):903-18. PubMed ID: 24210513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Volume currents in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models.
    Van Uitert R; Weinstein D; Johnson C
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2003 Jan; 31(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12572653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of head shape on EEG's and MEG's.
    Cuffin BN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1990 Jan; 37(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 2303269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of performance of spherical and realistic head models in dipole localization from noisy EEG.
    Vanrumste B; Van Hoey G; Van de Walle R; D'Havé MR; Lemahieu IA; Boon PA
    Med Eng Phys; 2002 Jul; 24(6):403-18. PubMed ID: 12135649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of head models on neuromagnetic fields and inverse source localizations.
    Ramon C; Haueisen J; Schimpf PH
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Oct; 5():55. PubMed ID: 17059601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of the isolated problem approach for multi-compartment BEM models of electro-magnetic source imaging.
    Gençer NG; Akalin-Acar Z
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3007-22. PubMed ID: 15972977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mapping human brain function with MEG and EEG: methods and validation.
    Darvas F; Pantazis D; Kucukaltun-Yildirim E; Leahy RM
    Neuroimage; 2004; 23 Suppl 1():S289-99. PubMed ID: 15501098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization.
    Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 May; 86(5):303-21. PubMed ID: 7685264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a new MEG-EEG spatio-temporal localization approach using a realistic source model.
    Schwartz DP; Badier JM; Bihoué P; Bouliou A
    Brain Topogr; 1999; 11(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 10449259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Array response kernels for EEG and MEG in multilayer ellipsoidal geometry.
    Gutiérrez D; Nehorai A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1103-11. PubMed ID: 18334402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hierarchical Bayesian inference for the EEG inverse problem using realistic FE head models: depth localization and source separation for focal primary currents.
    Lucka F; Pursiainen S; Burger M; Wolters CH
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jul; 61(4):1364-82. PubMed ID: 22537599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.