109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21829999)
1. [Critical evaluation of the diagnostic nomenclatures of cervical cytopathological exams used in the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS)].
Aguiar LS; Moura Tde P; Etlinger D; Yamamoto LS; di Loreto C; Cury LC; Pereira SM
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2011 Mar; 33(3):144-9. PubMed ID: 21829999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [External quality control for cervical cytology exams performed in the Brazilian Public Health System of Mato Grosso do Sul State].
de Freitas HG; Thuler LC
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2012 Aug; 34(8):351-6. PubMed ID: 23080277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving consistency in cervical cytology reporting.
Mitchell H
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1993 Oct; 85(19):1592-6. PubMed ID: 8411232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality Indicators of Cervical Cytopathology Tests in the Public Service in Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Tobias AH; Amaral RG; Diniz EM; Carneiro CM
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2016 Feb; 38(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 26883863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Regulatory closure of cervical cytology laboratories: recommendations for a public health response.
MMWR Recomm Rep; 1997 Dec; 46(RR-17):1-19. PubMed ID: 9409538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Validity of cervicovaginal cytology in a Brazilian State with high incidence rate of cervical cancer].
da Fonseca AJ; Murari RS; Moraes IS; Rocha RF; Ferreira LC
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2014 Aug; 36(8):347-52. PubMed ID: 25184347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implementation and evaluation of a national external quality control program for cervical cytology in Mexico.
Flisser A; García-Malo F; Canepa Mde L; Doncel S; Espinoza R; Moreno R; Avila I; Pérez-Palacios G; Tapia-Conyer R; de la Fuente JR
Salud Publica Mex; 2002; 44(5):431-6. PubMed ID: 12389486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Abnormal cervical cytology: new names, familiar smears.
Carulli DT
J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2003 Oct; 15(10):444-9. PubMed ID: 14606133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of the Excess of Papanicolaou Tests in Brazil from 2006 to 2015.
Fischer ACP; Fischer EAP; Vaz FB; Hoffmann J
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2022 Jan; 44(1):40-46. PubMed ID: 35092958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trends in Cervical Cytology Screening and Reporting Practices: Results From the College of American Pathologists 2011 PAP Education Supplemental Questionnaire.
Crothers BA; Darragh TM; Tambouret RH; Nayar R; Barkan GA; Zhao C; Booth CN; Padmanabhan V; Tabatabai ZL; Souers RJ; Thomas N; Wilbur DC; Moriarty AT
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Jan; 140(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 26046490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Papanicolaou smear cell recovery techniques used by primary care physicians.
Clement KD; Christenson PD
J Am Board Fam Pract; 1990; 3(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 2248091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
McGoogan E; Colgan TJ; Ramzy I; Cochand-Priollet B; Davey DD; Grohs HK; Gurley AM; Husain OA; Hutchinson ML; Knesel EA; Linder J; Mango LJ; Mitchell H; Peebles A; Reith A; Robinowitz M; Sauer T; Shida S; Solomon D; Topalidis T; Wilbur DC; Yamauchi K
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9479321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Daily peer review of abnormal cervical smears in the assessment of individual practice as an additional method of internal quality control.
Confortini M; Di Stefano C; Biggeri A; Bulgaresi P; Di Claudio G; Grisotto L; Maddau C; Matucci M; Petreschi C; Troni GM; Turco P; Foxi P
Cytopathology; 2016 Feb; 27(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 25123613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Cervicovaginal Cytopathological Samples Collected in Basic Health Units and in Private Clinics in the Midwest of Santa Catarina.
Dallazem B; Dambrós BP; Gamba CO; Perazzoli M; Kirschnick A
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2018 Feb; 40(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 29253911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Consistency of cytology diagnosis for cervical cancer between two laboratories.
Sriamporn S; Kritpetcharat O; Nieminen P; Suwanrungraung K; Kamsa-ard S; Parkin DM
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2005; 6(2):208-12. PubMed ID: 16101335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Review of cervical smears from 76 women with invasive cervical cancer: cytological findings and medicolegal implications.
Coleman DV; Poznansky JJ
Cytopathology; 2006 Jun; 17(3):127-36. PubMed ID: 16719855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical cytology quality assurance in Washington State.
Taylor V; Frost F
Acta Cytol; 1992; 36(2):246-50. PubMed ID: 1543009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproducibility study of cervical cytopathology in Mexico: a need for regulation and professional accreditation.
Lazcano-Ponce EC; Alonso de Ruiz P; Martinez-Arias C; Murguia-Riechers L
Diagn Cytopathol; 1997 Jul; 17(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 9218898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Agreement between cytology, colposcopy and cervical histopathology].
Katz LM; Souza AS; Fittipaldi SO; Santos Gde M; Amorim MM
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2010 Aug; 32(8):368-73. PubMed ID: 21180872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Quality and performance of pap smears in the cervical cancer screening program in a city of southern Brazil].
Uchimura NS; Nakano K; Nakano LC; Uchimura TT
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2009; 55(5):569-74. PubMed ID: 19918658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
