These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21830162)

  • 1. Testing the myth of the encoding-retrieval match.
    Goh WD; Lu SH
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Jan; 40(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 21830162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The myth of the encoding-retrieval match.
    Nairne JS
    Memory; 2002; 10(5-6):389-95. PubMed ID: 12396651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding?
    Grimaldi PJ; Karpicke JD
    Mem Cognit; 2012 May; 40(4):505-13. PubMed ID: 22238214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Memory as discrimination: a challenge to the encoding-retrieval match principle.
    Poirier M; Nairne JS; Morin C; Zimmermann FG; Koutmeridou K; Fowler J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):16-29. PubMed ID: 21823814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aging and memory as discrimination: Influences of encoding specificity, cue overload, and prior knowledge.
    Badham SP; Poirier M; Gandhi N; Hadjivassiliou A; Maylor EA
    Psychol Aging; 2016 Nov; 31(7):758-770. PubMed ID: 27831714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective memory and aging: evidence for preserved spontaneous retrieval with exact but not related cues.
    Mullet HG; Scullin MK; Hess TJ; Scullin RB; Arnold KM; Einstein GO
    Psychol Aging; 2013 Dec; 28(4):910-22. PubMed ID: 24364398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contextual match and cue-independence of retrieval-induced forgetting: Testing the prediction of the model by Norman, Newman, and Detre (2007).
    Hanczakowski M; Mazzoni G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):953-8. PubMed ID: 23088549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Age differences in encoding specificity.
    Puglisi JT; Park DC; Smith AD; Dudley WN
    J Gerontol; 1988 Nov; 43(6):P145-50. PubMed ID: 3183310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Immediate judgments of learning are insensitive to implicit interference effects at retrieval.
    Eakin DK; Hertzog C
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Jan; 40(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 21915761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Memory for temporal context: effects of ageing, encoding instructions, and retrieval strategies.
    Bastin C; Van der Linden M
    Memory; 2005 Jan; 13(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 15724911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of phonological and semantic cuing on encoding and retrieval processes in adolescent psychosis.
    Doré MC; Caza N; Gingras N; Maziade M; Rouleau N
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2009 Jul; 31(5):533-44. PubMed ID: 18773312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Age differences in cued recall and recognition under varying encoding and retrieval conditions.
    West RL; Boatwright LK
    Exp Aging Res; 1983; 9(3):185-9. PubMed ID: 6641780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective memory: the relative effects of encoding, retrieval, and the match between encoding and retrieval.
    Hannon B; Daneman M
    Memory; 2007 Jul; 15(5):572-604. PubMed ID: 17613799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ERP correlates of intentional forgetting.
    Mecklinger A; Parra M; Waldhauser GT
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():132-47. PubMed ID: 19103178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and self-initiated semantic elaboration during memory retrieval.
    Raposo A; Han S; Dobbins IG
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Sep; 47(11):2261-71. PubMed ID: 19038275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improvement of encoding and retrieval in normal and pathological aging with word-picture paradigm.
    Iodice R; Meilán JJ; Carro J
    Aging Ment Health; 2015; 19(10):940-6. PubMed ID: 25560063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.
    McEvoy CL; Nelson DL
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2314223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The dual effect of context on memory of related and unrelated themes: discrimination at encoding and cue at retrieval.
    Levy-Gigi E; Vakil E
    Memory; 2012; 20(7):728-41. PubMed ID: 22809325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The properties of retrieval cues constrain the picture superiority effect.
    Weldon MS; Roediger HL; Challis BH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 2913461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intelligence as the efficiency of cue-driven retrieval from secondary memory.
    Liesefeld HR; Hoffmann E; Wentura D
    Memory; 2016; 24(3):285-94. PubMed ID: 25626154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.