328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21830244)
1. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review.
Chan YY; Jayaprakasan K; Tan A; Thornton JG; Coomarasamy A; Raine-Fenning NJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):371-82. PubMed ID: 21830244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical length and quantitative fetal fibronectin in the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in asymptomatic women with congenital uterine anomaly.
Ridout AE; Ibeto LA; Ross GN; Cook JR; Sykes L; David AL; Seed PT; Tribe RM; Bennett PR; Terzidou V; Shennan AH; Chandiramani M; ; Brown RG; Chatfield S; Sadeh D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):341.e1-341.e9. PubMed ID: 31132343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of congenital uterine anomalies on reproductive outcomes of IVF/ICSI-embryo transfer: a retrospective study.
Kang J; Qiao J
Eur J Med Res; 2024 Jan; 29(1):48. PubMed ID: 38212852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prevalence of uterine anomalies and their impact on early pregnancy in women conceiving after assisted reproduction treatment.
Jayaprakasan K; Chan YY; Sur S; Deb S; Clewes JS; Raine-Fenning NJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jun; 37(6):727-32. PubMed ID: 21337662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of Hysteroscopic Metroplasty on Reproductive Outcomes in Women with Septate Uterus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Carrera M; Pérez Millan F; Alcázar JL; Alonso L; Caballero M; Carugno J; Dominguez JA; Moratalla E
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Apr; 29(4):465-475. PubMed ID: 34648934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical implications of congenital uterine anomalies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.
Venetis CA; Papadopoulos SP; Campo R; Gordts S; Tarlatzis BC; Grimbizis GF
Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Dec; 29(6):665-83. PubMed ID: 25444500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcome of assisted reproduction in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a prospective observational study.
Prior M; Richardson A; Asif S; Polanski L; Parris-Larkin M; Chandler J; Fogg L; Jassal P; Thornton JG; Raine-Fenning NJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 51(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 29055072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The association between congenital uterine anomalies and perinatal outcomes - does type of defect matters?
Naeh A; Sigal E; Barda S; Hallak M; Gabbay-Benziv R
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):7406-7411. PubMed ID: 34238096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. No clinical relevance of the height of fundal indentation in subseptate or arcuate uterus: a prospective study.
Gergolet M; Campo R; Verdenik I; Kenda Suster N; Gordts S; Gianaroli L
Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 May; 24(5):576-82. PubMed ID: 22417666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Uterine anomalies and pregnancy outcome following resectoscope metroplasty.
Zlopasa G; Skrablin S; Kalafatić D; Banović V; Lesin J
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 98(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 17588572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproductive outcomes in women with uterine anomalies.
Lin PC
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2004; 13(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15006276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Obstetric outcome of women with uterine anomalies in China.
Zhang Y; Zhao YY; Qiao J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2010 Feb; 123(4):418-22. PubMed ID: 20193480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Uterine anomaly and recurrent pregnancy loss.
Sugiura-Ogasawara M; Ozaki Y; Katano K; Suzumori N; Mizutani E
Semin Reprod Med; 2011 Nov; 29(6):514-21. PubMed ID: 22161464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review.
Chan YY; Jayaprakasan K; Zamora J; Thornton JG; Raine-Fenning N; Coomarasamy A
Hum Reprod Update; 2011; 17(6):761-71. PubMed ID: 21705770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Type of congenital uterine anomaly and adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Fox NS; Roman AS; Stern EM; Gerber RS; Saltzman DH; Rebarber A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Jun; 27(9):949-53. PubMed ID: 24050215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What type of uterine anomalies had an additional effect on pregnancy outcomes, compared to other uterine anomalies? An evaluation of a large population database.
Kadour Peero E; Badeghiesh A; Baghlaf H; Dahan MH
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(26):10494-10501. PubMed ID: 36216352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproductive, Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes in Women with Congenital Uterine Anomalies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Kim MA; Kim HS; Kim YH
J Clin Med; 2021 Oct; 10(21):. PubMed ID: 34768344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hysteroscopically detected asymptomatic müllerian anomalies. Prevalence and reproductive implications.
Maneschi F; Zupi E; Marconi D; Valli E; Romanini C; Mancuso S
J Reprod Med; 1995 Oct; 40(10):684-8. PubMed ID: 8551467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproductive impact of congenital Müllerian anomalies.
Raga F; Bauset C; Remohi J; Bonilla-Musoles F; Simón C; Pellicer A
Hum Reprod; 1997 Oct; 12(10):2277-81. PubMed ID: 9402295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Obstetric Complications in Women With Congenital Uterine Anomalies According to the 2013 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy Classification: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Panagiotopoulos M; Tseke P; Michala L
Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jan; 139(1):138-148. PubMed ID: 34856567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
