These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21830509)

  • 1. Trustworthiness and IT suspicion: an evaluation of the nomological network.
    Lyons JB; Stokes CK; Eschleman KJ; Alarcon GM; Barelka AJ
    Hum Factors; 2011 Jun; 53(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 21830509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The construct of state-level suspicion: a model and research agenda for automated and information technology (IT) contexts.
    Bobko P; Barelka AJ; Hirshfield LM
    Hum Factors; 2014 May; 56(3):489-508. PubMed ID: 24930171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring Individual Differences in the Perfect Automation Schema.
    Merritt SM; Unnerstall JL; Lee D; Huber K
    Hum Factors; 2015 Aug; 57(5):740-53. PubMed ID: 25882304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human-human reliance in the context of automation.
    Lyons JB; Stokes CK
    Hum Factors; 2012 Feb; 54(1):112-21. PubMed ID: 22409106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. I trust it, but I don't know why: effects of implicit attitudes toward automation on trust in an automated system.
    Merritt SM; Heimbaugh H; LaChapell J; Lee D
    Hum Factors; 2013 Jun; 55(3):520-34. PubMed ID: 23829027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems.
    Madhavan P; Wiegmann DA
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):773-85. PubMed ID: 17915596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Who's the real expert here? Pedigree's unique bias on trust between human and automated advisers.
    Pearson CJ; Geden M; Mayhorn CB
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Nov; 81():102907. PubMed ID: 31422272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual differences in the calibration of trust in automation.
    Pop VL; Shrewsbury A; Durso FT
    Hum Factors; 2015 Jun; 57(4):545-56. PubMed ID: 25977317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automation bias: empirical results assessing influencing factors.
    Goddard K; Roudsari A; Wyatt JC
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 May; 83(5):368-75. PubMed ID: 24581700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trying to trust: Brain activity during interpersonal social attitude change.
    Filkowski MM; Anderson IW; Haas BW
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 16(2):325-38. PubMed ID: 26567160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Keep Your Scanners Peeled: Gaze Behavior as a Measure of Automation Trust During Highly Automated Driving.
    Hergeth S; Lorenz L; Vilimek R; Krems JF
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):509-19. PubMed ID: 26843570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decision support aids with anthropomorphic characteristics influence trust and performance in younger and older adults.
    Pak R; Fink N; Price M; Bass B; Sturre L
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(9):1059-72. PubMed ID: 22799560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents.
    de Visser EJ; Monfort SS; McKendrick R; Smith MA; McKnight PE; Krueger F; Parasuraman R
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2016 Sep; 22(3):331-49. PubMed ID: 27505048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automation trust and attention allocation in multitasking workspace.
    Karpinsky ND; Chancey ET; Palmer DB; Yamani Y
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jul; 70():194-201. PubMed ID: 29866311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Examining single- and multiple-process theories of trust in automation.
    Rice S
    J Gen Psychol; 2009 Jul; 136(3):303-19. PubMed ID: 19650524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploring the Combination of Dempster-Shafer Theory and Neural Network for Predicting Trust and Distrust.
    Wang X; Wang Y; Sun H
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2016; 2016():5403105. PubMed ID: 27034651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Little Anthropomorphism Goes a Long Way.
    de Visser EJ; Monfort SS; Goodyear K; Lu L; O'Hara M; Lee MR; Parasuraman R; Krueger F
    Hum Factors; 2017 Feb; 59(1):116-133. PubMed ID: 28146673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Not all trust is created equal: dispositional and history-based trust in human-automation interactions.
    Merritt SM; Ilgen DR
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):194-210. PubMed ID: 18516832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Supporting trust calibration and the effective use of decision aids by presenting dynamic system confidence information.
    McGuirl JM; Sarter NB
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(4):656-65. PubMed ID: 17240714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trust and Distrust of Automated Parking in a Tesla Model X.
    Tenhundfeld NL; de Visser EJ; Ries AJ; Finomore VS; Tossell CC
    Hum Factors; 2020 Mar; 62(2):194-210. PubMed ID: 31419163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.