BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

852 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21830922)

  • 1. Bayesian approach to noninferiority trials for proportions.
    Gamalo MA; Wu R; Tiwari RC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Sep; 21(5):902-19. PubMed ID: 21830922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Semiparametric bayesian testing procedure for noninferiority trials with binary endpoints.
    Osman M; Ghosh SK
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Sep; 21(5):920-37. PubMed ID: 21830923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian approach to non-inferiority trials for normal means.
    Gamalo MA; Wu R; Tiwari RC
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Feb; 25(1):221-40. PubMed ID: 22619277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Issues with statistical risks for testing methods in noninferiority trial without a placebo ARM.
    Hung HM; Wang SJ; O'Neill R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):201-13. PubMed ID: 17365218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation.
    Lewis RJ; Lipsky AM; Berry DA
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 17327241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian approach for assessing noninferiority in a three-arm trial with binary endpoint.
    Ghosh S; Tiwari RC; Ghosh S
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Jul; 17(4):342-357. PubMed ID: 29473291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A behavioural Bayes approach to the determination of sample size for clinical trials considering efficacy and safety: imbalanced sample size in treatment groups.
    Kikuchi T; Gittins J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2011 Aug; 20(4):389-400. PubMed ID: 20223784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomization as a basis for inference in noninferiority trials.
    Wiens BL
    Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 17128425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing noninferiority in a three-arm trial using the Bayesian approach.
    Ghosh P; Nathoo F; Gönen M; Tiwari RC
    Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(15):1795-808. PubMed ID: 21520456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Practical Bayesian design and analysis for drug and device clinical trials.
    Hobbs BP; Carlin BP
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(1):54-80. PubMed ID: 18161542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-arm noninferiority trials with a prespecified margin for inference of the difference in the proportions of binary endpoints.
    Hida E; Tango T
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(4):774-89. PubMed ID: 23799810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian noninferiority test for 2 binomial probabilities as the extension of Fisher exact test.
    Doi M; Takahashi F; Kawasaki Y
    Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(30):4789-4803. PubMed ID: 28960376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian statistical inference enhances the interpretation of contemporary randomized controlled trials.
    Wijeysundera DN; Austin PC; Hux JE; Beattie WS; Laupacis A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):13-21.e5. PubMed ID: 18947971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Making sense of noninferiority: a clinical and statistical perspective on its application to cardiovascular clinical trials.
    Kaul S; Diamond GA
    Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2007; 49(4):284-99. PubMed ID: 17185116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian approaches in medical device clinical trials: a discussion with examples in the regulatory setting.
    Bonangelino P; Irony T; Liang S; Li X; Mukhi V; Ruan S; Xu Y; Yang X; Wang C
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Sep; 21(5):938-53. PubMed ID: 21830924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Choice of delta noninferiority margin and dependency of the noninferiority trials.
    Tsong Y; Zhang J; Levenson M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 17365224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing methods for calculating confidence intervals for vaccine efficacy.
    Ewell M
    Stat Med; 1996 Nov 15-30; 15(21-22):2379-92. PubMed ID: 8931208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noninferiority testing beyond simple two-sample comparison.
    Tsong Y; Chen WJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):289-308. PubMed ID: 17365225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Likelihood ratio and a Bayesian approach were superior to standard noninferiority analysis when the noninferiority margin varied with the control event rate.
    Kim MY; Xue X
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 57(12):1253-61. PubMed ID: 15617951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian hypothesis testing in two-arm trials with dichotomous outcomes.
    Zaslavsky BG
    Biometrics; 2013 Mar; 69(1):157-63. PubMed ID: 23002906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 43.