BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21831013)

  • 1. Health technology assessments in personalized medicine: illustrations for cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Postma MJ; Boersma C; Vandijck D; Vegter S; Le HH; Annemans L
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2011 Aug; 11(4):367-9. PubMed ID: 21831013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are current ICER thresholds outdated? Valuing medicines in the era of personalized healthcare.
    Carrera P; IJzerman MJ
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2016 Aug; 16(4):435-7. PubMed ID: 27118144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Technology assessment: approach and reimbursement.
    Yaszemski MJ; Polly DW; Boden SD; Andersson GB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(11 Suppl):S39-43. PubMed ID: 17495585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Personalized medicine policy challenges: measuring clinical utility at point of care.
    van Rooij T; Wilson DM; Marsh S
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2012 Jun; 12(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 22812553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early dialogue between the developers of new technologies and pricing and reimbursement agencies: a pilot study.
    Backhouse ME; Wonder M; Hornby E; Kilburg A; Drummond M; Mayer FK
    Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):608-15. PubMed ID: 21669387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Technology assessment for new oncology drugs.
    Jönsson B
    Clin Cancer Res; 2013 Jan; 19(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 23288370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [New EBM: is it really so detrimental to physicians?].
    Schmidt K
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2004 Sep; 146(39):56-7. PubMed ID: 15532417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Haute Autorite de sante opinion on cost-effectiveness of health products : results and perspectives].
    Midy F; Raimond V; Thébaut C; Sambuc C; Rumeau-Pichon C
    Sante Publique; 2015; 27(5):691-700. PubMed ID: 26752035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Better defining target populations for drugs with a view to reimbursement.
    Massol J; Boissel JP
    Therapie; 2014; 69(3):235-7. PubMed ID: 24927505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The clinical context of technology assessment.
    Smits HL
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1984; 9(l):31-40. PubMed ID: 11650667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Economic feasibility study and reimbursement rules--illustrated by a concrete example].
    Keiding H; Faergeman O
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Feb; 170(8):651-4. PubMed ID: 18364159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Regulation, reimbursement, and the long road of implementation of personalized medicine--a perspective from the United States.
    Frueh FW
    Value Health; 2013; 16(6 Suppl):S27-31. PubMed ID: 24034309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Update on technology assessment in dentistry.
    Antczak-Bouckoms A; Tulloch JF
    Curr Opin Dent; 1992 Jun; 2():10-4. PubMed ID: 1387819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pharmacogenetics and personalized medicine.
    Li-Wan-Po A
    J Clin Pharm Ther; 2012 Dec; 37(6):617-9. PubMed ID: 23013532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How should cost-effectiveness analysis be used in health technology coverage decisions? Evidence from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence approach.
    Williams I; Bryan S; McIver S
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Apr; 12(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 17407655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Technology assessment in medicine: methods, status and trends.
    Hendee WR
    Med Prog Technol; 1991; 17(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 1835752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A survey of reimbursement practices of private health insurance companies for pharmaceuticals not covered under the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme 2008.
    Lingaratnam SM; Kirsa SW; Mellor JD; Jackson J; Crellin W; Fitzsimons M; Zalcberg JR
    Aust Health Rev; 2011 May; 35(2):204-10. PubMed ID: 21612735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medicare and cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Neumann PJ; Rosen AB; Weinstein MC
    N Engl J Med; 2005 Oct; 353(14):1516-22. PubMed ID: 16207857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response to the expertise: procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany, by Geertruida E. Bekkering and Jos Kleijnen.
    Koch K; Lange S
    Eur J Health Econ; 2009 May; 10(2):233-6. PubMed ID: 19123011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.