These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21831973)

  • 1. Influence of materials radiopacity in the radiographic diagnosis of secondary caries: evaluation in film and two digital systems.
    Pedrosa RF; Brasileiro IV; dos Anjos Pontual ML; dos Anjos Pontual A; da Silveira MM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Sep; 40(6):344-50. PubMed ID: 21831973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of composite resin restoration radiopacity on radiographic diagnosis and decision-making.
    Canto JDA; de Mendonça LS; de Arruda JAA; Alvares PR; Moreno A; Pontual MLA; da Silveira MMF
    Gen Dent; 2019; 67(5):72-76. PubMed ID: 31454328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of composite resin restorations and lining on radiographic diagnosis and decision-making: an in vitro investigation.
    de Araujo RG; Monteiro GQ; Pontual Ados A; Pedrosa RF; Pontual ML; da Silveira MM
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(2):111-9; quiz 120-1. PubMed ID: 22414504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discrimination between restorative dental materials by their radiopacity measured in film radiographs and digital images.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hørsted-Bindslev P
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1998 Jun; 16(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 9922755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin.
    Walter R; Boushell LW; Heymann HO; Ritter AV; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD; Chung Y; Swift EJ
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 24344912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of restorative material and location on the detection of simulated recurrent caries. A comparison of dental film, direct digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography.
    Nair MK; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; May K; Ye F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 9656871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-year clinical performance of a nanofiller vs a fine-particle hybrid resin composite.
    Ernst CP; Brandenbusch M; Meyer G; Canbek K; Gottschalk F; Willershausen B
    Clin Oral Investig; 2006 Jun; 10(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 16555069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of radiographic detection of residual caries in connection with tunnel restorations.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hörsted-Bindslev P
    Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 9438567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiopacity of dental restorative materials.
    Hitij T; Fidler A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 May; 17(4):1167-77. PubMed ID: 22824916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of cavity configuration on microleakage around Class V restorations bonded with seven self-etching adhesives.
    Santini A; Ivanovic V; Ibbetson R; Milia E
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2004; 16(2):128-35; discussion 136. PubMed ID: 15500062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cuspal deflection in premolar teeth restored using current composite resins with and without resin-modified glass ionomer liner.
    Karaman E; Ozgunaltay G
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 23092141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noncarious class V lesions restored with a polyacid modified resin composite and a nanocomposite: a two-year clinical trial.
    Türkün LS; Celik EU
    J Adhes Dent; 2008 Oct; 10(5):399-405. PubMed ID: 19058687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiopacity of resin-based materials measured in film radiographs and storage phosphor plate (Digora).
    Sabbagh J; Vreven J; Leloup G
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):677-84. PubMed ID: 15646224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiopacity of direct esthetic restorative materials.
    Turgut MD; Attar N; Onen A
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 14531595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Newer Class I cavity preparation for permanent teeth using air abrasion and composite restoration.
    Ferdianakis K; White GE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(3):201-16. PubMed ID: 10686867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
    Hintze H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of radiopacity of dental composites on the diagnosis of secondary caries: the correlation between objective and subjective analyses.
    Cruz AD; Esteves RG; Poiate IA; Portero PP; Almeida SM
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 23713807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Study of the radio-opacity of base and liner dental materials using a digital radiography system.
    Lachowski KM; Botta SB; Lascala CA; Matos AB; Sobral MA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(2):20120153. PubMed ID: 23393292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-year clinical evaluation of different restorative resins in class I restorations.
    Yazici AR; Ustunkol I; Ozgunaltay G; Dayangac B
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24754716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.