These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [ROC analysis of image quality in digital luminescence radiography in comparison with current film-screen systems in mammography]. Wiebringhaus R; John V; Müller RD; Hirche H; Voss M; Callies R Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Jul; 5(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 7548257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recent advances in screen-film mammography. Haus AG Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammographic microcalcifications: detection with xerography, screen-film, and digitized film display. Smathers RL; Bush E; Drace J; Stevens M; Sommer FG; Brown BW; Karras B Radiology; 1986 Jun; 159(3):673-7. PubMed ID: 3704149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Direct digital magnification mammography with a large-surface detector made of amorphous silicon]. Hermann KP; Hundertmark C; Funke M; von Brenndorff A; Grabbe E Rofo; 1999 May; 170(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 10370416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic]. Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Technologic improvements in screen-film mammography. Haus AG Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):628-37. PubMed ID: 2406777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnification mammography: evaluation of screen-film and xeroradiographic techniques. Haus AG; Paulus DD; Dodd GD; Cowart RW; Bencomo J Radiology; 1979 Oct; 133(1):223-6. PubMed ID: 472295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Survey of mammography practices. Bassett LW; Diamond JJ; Gold RH; McLelland R AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Dec; 149(6):1149-52. PubMed ID: 3318338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography. Grahn A; Hemdal B; Andersson I; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Börjesson S; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Månsson LG; Medin J; Wanninger F; Panzer W Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Examinations of rare-earth film-screen-systems for image detectors in mammography (author's transl)]. Weberling R Rontgenblatter; 1979 Mar; 32(3):109-16. PubMed ID: 432483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography. Feig SA; Yaffe MJ Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1205-30. PubMed ID: 7480666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: general overview of fluoroscopic imaging. Schueler BA Radiographics; 2000; 20(4):1115-26. PubMed ID: 10903700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. Measures of screen-film performance. Haus AG Radiographics; 1996 Sep; 16(5):1165-81. PubMed ID: 8888396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. For mammography, it's digital vs. screen-film. D'Orsi CJ; Karellas A Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D16-8. PubMed ID: 10724730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Microfocal spot magnification mammography using xeroradiographic and screen-film recording systems. Sickles EA Radiology; 1979 Jun; 131(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 441362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Somatic radiation risk to the breast under different radiological research procedures]. John V; Ewen K Strahlenther Onkol; 1986 Jan; 162(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 3945919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]