These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2183301)
21. Modification of an automatic exposure control system for mammography to accommodate multiple-speed, screen-film systems. Rossi RP; Williams C; Gill D AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Oct; 151(4):685-6. PubMed ID: 3262269 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Breast radiation dose in film/screen mammography. Prado KL; Rakowski JT; Barragan F; Vanek KN Health Phys; 1988 Jul; 55(1):81-3. PubMed ID: 3391781 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Optimizing techniques in screen-film mammography. Hendrick RE; Berns EA Radiol Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 38(4):701-18, viii. PubMed ID: 10943272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Characteristics of screen-film systems for mammography in relation to a diverse modality of treatment]. Rosselli Del Turco M; Milano F; Giani M; Bravetti P Radiol Med; 1988 Apr; 75(4):390-4. PubMed ID: 3375482 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Digital and screen-film mammography: comparison of image acquisition and interpretation times. Berns EA; Hendrick RE; Solari M; Barke L; Reddy D; Wolfman J; Segal L; DeLeon P; Benjamin S; Willis L AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jul; 187(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 16794152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Image quality in film and xero-mammography. I. Rendering of low contrast values (author's transl)]. Säbel M; Paterok EM; Weishaar J; Willgeroth F Rofo; 1977 Jun; 126(6):529-36. PubMed ID: 142714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessment of radiographic screen-film systems: a comparison between the use of a microdensitometer and a drum film digitiser. Verdun FR; Pachoud M; Bergmann D; Buhr E Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):208-13. PubMed ID: 15933110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of a defective filter on magnification image quality in mammography. Cardenosa G; Eklund GW Radiology; 1992 Mar; 182(3):894-5. PubMed ID: 1535914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The XERG-mammography system: a solution to the dose-quality problem? Friedrich M Eur J Radiol; 1981 May; 1(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 7338239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quality control in mammography. Hendrick RE; Botsco M; Plott CM Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1041-57. PubMed ID: 7480654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Film quality in film mammography. Article II: Signal/noise ratio of the recording system as a quantitative measure of quality. Final evaluation of recording systems (author's transl)]. Friedrich M; Weskamp P Rofo; 1976 Nov; 125(5):461-71. PubMed ID: 137194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Advantages of magnification in digital phase-contrast mammography using a practical X-ray tube. Honda C; Ohara H Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S69-72. PubMed ID: 18584984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Sensitometry of Mammographic Screen-film System Using Bootstrap Aluminum Step-Wedge.]. Abe S; Imada R; Terauchi T; Fujisaki T; Monma M; Nishimura K; Saitoh H; Mochizuki Y Igaku Butsuri; 2005; 25(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 16479054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Characteristics of x-ray intensifying screens for mammography]. Gorelik FG; Kon'kova GV Med Tekh; 1985; (1):48-51. PubMed ID: 3974436 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. A demonstration comparing film mammography with the new high sensitivity xeromammography. Martin JE Radiographics; 1989 Jan; 9(1):153-68. PubMed ID: 2913617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]