These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
44. Mammography as a radiographic examination: an overview. Vyborny CJ; Schmidt RA Radiographics; 1989 Jul; 9(4):723-64. PubMed ID: 2667052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: X-ray image intensifiers for fluoroscopy. Wang J; Blackburn TJ Radiographics; 2000; 20(5):1471-7. PubMed ID: 10992034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. CR matches screen-film in breast imaging exams. Freedman MT Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1997 Sep; 19(9):73-6. PubMed ID: 10170163 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Physics and chemistry of film and processing. Kitts EI Radiographics; 1996 Nov; 16(6):1467-79; quiz 1464-5. PubMed ID: 8946547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Relative doses in mammography: the future development of film/screen mammography systems. Kitts EL; Beutel J; Holland RS; Blank B Recent Results Cancer Res; 1990; 119():1-9. PubMed ID: 2236846 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. The use of a contrast-detail test object in the optimization of optical density in mammography. Robson KJ; Kotre CJ; Faulkner K Br J Radiol; 1995 Mar; 68(807):277-82. PubMed ID: 7735767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Mammographic density categories. Hall FM AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):242-3. PubMed ID: 11756133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. [Considerations on direct magnification in radiology]. San Nicolò M; Moroder E Radiol Med; 1986; 72(7-8):579-83. PubMed ID: 3737993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Latent image fading in screen-film mammography: lack of clinical relevance for batch-processed films. Sickles EA Radiology; 1995 Feb; 194(2):389-92. PubMed ID: 7824715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Sensitivity, resolution and contrast of film-screen combinations. Paix D; Holloway AF Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1984; 7(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 6477334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Mammographic artifact due to film. Margolies L Radiology; 1998 Aug; 208(2):552-3. PubMed ID: 9680594 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. On optimizing the xeromammographic image. Fatouros PP; Rao GU Med Phys; 1979; 6(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 440225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Radiographic information theory and application to mammography. Brodie I; Gutcheck RA Med Phys; 1982; 9(1):79-95. PubMed ID: 7078533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A comparison of four mammographic image quality test objects. Payne M; Lawinski CP Br J Radiol; 1992 Apr; 65(772):339-41. PubMed ID: 1581793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Resolution and noise in xeromammography. Fatouros PP Med Phys; 1982; 9(6):819-29. PubMed ID: 7162469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]