These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21833217)

  • 1. Testing transitivity of preferences on two-alternative forced choice data.
    Regenwetter M; Dana J; Davis-Stober CP
    Front Psychol; 2010; 1():148. PubMed ID: 21833217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transitivity of preferences.
    Regenwetter M; Dana J; Davis-Stober CP
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Jan; 118(1):42-56. PubMed ID: 21244185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. QTest: Quantitative Testing of Theories of Binary Choice.
    Regenwetter M; Davis-Stober CP; Lim SH; Guo Y; Popova A; Zwilling C; Cha YS; Messner W
    Decisions; 2014 Jan; 1(1):2-34. PubMed ID: 24999495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How do people build up visual memory representations from sensory evidence? Revisiting two classic models of choice.
    Robinson MM; DeStefano IC; Vul E; Brady TF
    J Math Psychol; 2023 Dec; 117():. PubMed ID: 38957571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recasting a biologically motivated computational model within a Fechnerian and random utility framework.
    Davis-Stober CP; Brown N; Park S; Regenwetter M
    J Math Psychol; 2017 Apr; 77():156-164. PubMed ID: 28827888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Remarkable properties for diagnostics and inference of ranking data modelling.
    Mollica C; Tardella L
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2022 May; 75(2):334-362. PubMed ID: 35132613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monkeys choose as if maximizing utility compatible with basic principles of revealed preference theory.
    Pastor-Bernier A; Plott CR; Schultz W
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Mar; 114(10):E1766-E1775. PubMed ID: 28202727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Empirical evidence for intransitivity in consumer preferences.
    Guadalupe-Lanas J; Cruz-Cárdenas J; Artola-Jarrín V; Palacio-Fierro A
    Heliyon; 2020 Mar; 6(3):e03459. PubMed ID: 32154417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurements of Rationality: Individual Differences in Information Processing, the Transitivity of Preferences and Decision Strategies.
    Sleboda P; Sokolowska J
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1844. PubMed ID: 29093695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transitivity of odor preferences: constant and particularities in hedonic perception.
    Brand G; Haaz V; Jacquot L
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Sep; 98(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 23008522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Violations of transitivity: Implications for a theory of contextual choice.
    Grace RC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Jul; 60(1):185-201. PubMed ID: 16812697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transitive responding in animals and humans: Exaptation rather than adaptation?
    Delius JD; Siemann M
    Behav Processes; 1998 Feb; 42(2-3):107-37. PubMed ID: 24897458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence against Rank-Dependent Utility Theories: Tests of Cumulative Independence, Interval Independence, Stochastic Dominance, and Transitivity.
    Birnbaum MH; Patton JN; Lott MK
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1999 Jan; 77(1):44-83. PubMed ID: 9924141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing mixture models of transitive preference: comment on Regenwetter, Dana, and Davis-Stober (2011).
    Birnbaum MH
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Oct; 118(4):675-83; discussion 684-8. PubMed ID: 22003844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Judging statistical models of individual decision making under risk using in- and out-of-sample criteria.
    Drichoutis AC; Lusk JL
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e102269. PubMed ID: 25029467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Female mate choice in convict cichlids is transitive and consistent with a self-referent directional preference.
    Dechaume-Moncharmont FX; Freychet M; Motreuil S; Cézilly F
    Front Zool; 2013 Nov; 10(1):69. PubMed ID: 24216003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Irrational decision-making in an amoeboid organism: transitivity and context-dependent preferences.
    Latty T; Beekman M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2011 Jan; 278(1703):307-12. PubMed ID: 20702460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Violations of stochastic transitivity on concurrent chains: Implications for theories of choice.
    Houston A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 May; 55(3):323-35. PubMed ID: 16812638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extended Formulations for Order Polytopes through Network Flows.
    Davis-Stober CP; Doignon JP; Fiorini S; Glineur F; Regenwetter M
    J Math Psychol; 2018 Dec; 87():1-10. PubMed ID: 30906069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring Weak Consistency and Weak Transitivity of Pairwise Comparison Matrices.
    Liu F; Zou S; Pedrycz W
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2023 Jan; 53(1):303-314. PubMed ID: 34347619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.