These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21833229)

  • 1. Testing for heterogeneous factor loadings using mixtures of confirmatory factor analysis models.
    Buzick HM
    Front Psychol; 2010; 1():165. PubMed ID: 21833229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating the Applicability of Alignment-A Monte Carlo Simulation Study.
    Wen C; Hu F
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():845721. PubMed ID: 35814060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An essay on measurement and factorial invariance.
    Meredith W; Teresi JA
    Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S69-77. PubMed ID: 17060838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distinguishing between latent classes and continuous factors with categorical outcomes: Class invariance of parameters of factor mixture models.
    Lubke G; Neale M
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2008 Oct; 43(4):592-620. PubMed ID: 20165736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the equivalency of factor and network loadings.
    Christensen AP; Golino H
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Aug; 53(4):1563-1580. PubMed ID: 33409985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Class Enumeration and Parameter Recovery of Growth Mixture Modeling and Second-Order Growth Mixture Modeling in the Presence of Measurement Noninvariance between Latent Classes.
    Kim ES; Wang Y
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1499. PubMed ID: 28928691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: Factor Structure and Invariance in a Sample of Breast Cancer Patients and in a Non-Clinical Sample.
    Ramos C; Leal I; Marôco AL; Tedeschi RG
    Span J Psychol; 2016 Oct; 19():E64. PubMed ID: 27692020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating measurement invariance across assessment modes of phone interview and computer self-administered survey for the PROMIS measures in a population-based cohort of localized prostate cancer survivors.
    Wang M; Chen RC; Usinger DS; Reeve BB
    Qual Life Res; 2017 Nov; 26(11):2973-2985. PubMed ID: 28681335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement invariance of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) among Chinese and Dutch elderly.
    Zhang B; Fokkema M; Cuijpers P; Li J; Smits N; Beekman A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 May; 11():74. PubMed ID: 21595982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of error structure misspecification when testing measurement invariance and latent-factor mean difference using MIMIC and multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis.
    Joo SH; Kim ES
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Dec; 51(6):2688-2699. PubMed ID: 30242617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The consequences of ignoring measurement invariance for path coefficients in structural equation models.
    Guenole N; Brown A
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():980. PubMed ID: 25278911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mixture IRT Model With a Higher-Order Structure for Latent Traits.
    Huang HY
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Apr; 77(2):275-304. PubMed ID: 29795914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Confirmatory factor analysis and measurement invariance of the English, Mandarin, and Malay versions of the SF-12v2 within a representative sample of the multi-ethnic Singapore population.
    Lau JH; Abdin E; Vaingankar JA; Shafie S; Sambasivam R; Shahwan S; Thumboo J; Chong SA; Subramaniam M
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Mar; 19(1):80. PubMed ID: 33691707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What to do when scalar invariance fails: The extended alignment method for multi-group factor analysis comparison of latent means across many groups.
    Marsh HW; Guo J; Parker PD; Nagengast B; Asparouhov T; Muthén B; Dicke T
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Sep; 23(3):524-545. PubMed ID: 28080078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Impact of Partial Factorial Invariance on Cross-Group Comparisons.
    Shi D; Song H; Lewis MD
    Assessment; 2019 Oct; 26(7):1217-1233. PubMed ID: 28598216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing measurement invariance of the GHQ-28 in stroke patients.
    Munyombwe T; West RM; Hill K
    Qual Life Res; 2015 Aug; 24(8):1823-7. PubMed ID: 25609221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Examining posttraumatic stress disorder's latent structure between treatment-seeking and non-treatment-seeking Filipinos.
    Mordeno IG; Nalipay MJ; Untalan JH; Decatoria JB
    Asian J Psychiatr; 2014 Oct; 11():28-34. PubMed ID: 25453693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing for Equivalence of Measurement Scales: Simple Structure and Metric Invariance Reconsidered.
    Labouvie E; Ruetsch C
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1995 Jan; 30(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 26828344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mixture multigroup factor analysis for unraveling factor loading noninvariance across many groups.
    De Roover K; Vermunt JK; Ceulemans E
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Jun; 27(3):281-306. PubMed ID: 33271027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Impact of Test and Sample Characteristics on Model Selection and Classification Accuracy in the Multilevel Mixture IRT Model.
    Sen S; Cohen AS
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():197. PubMed ID: 32116973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.