These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2183346)

  • 41. Microleakage and sealant penetration in contaminated carious fissures.
    Hevinga MA; Opdam NJ; Frencken JE; Bronkhorst EM; Truin GJ
    J Dent; 2007 Dec; 35(12):909-14. PubMed ID: 17961903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Microleakage of Glass Ionomer-based Provisional Cement in CAD/CAM-Fabricated Interim Crowns: An in vitro Study.
    Farah RI; Al-Harethi N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Oct; 17(10):801-806. PubMed ID: 27794149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Caries-preventive effect of sealants produced with altered glass-ionomer materials, after 2 years.
    Chen X; Du MQ; Fan MW; Mulder J; Huysmans MC; Frencken JE
    Dent Mater; 2012 May; 28(5):554-60. PubMed ID: 22300651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
    da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Frequency of remnants of sealants left behind in pits and fissures of occlusal surfaces after 2 and 3 years.
    Hu X; Zhang W; Fan M; Mulder J; Frencken JE
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jan; 21(1):143-149. PubMed ID: 26961522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Microleakage of indirect inlays placed on different kinds of glass ionomer cement linings.
    Karaağaclioğlu L; Zaimoğlu A; Akören AC
    J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Sep; 19(5):457-69. PubMed ID: 1453258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Caries-Preventive Effect and Retention of Glass-Ionomer and Resin-Based Sealants: A Randomized Clinical Comparative Evaluation.
    Uzel I; Gurlek C; Kuter B; Ertugrul F; Eden E
    Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():7205692. PubMed ID: 35769675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Rationale for caries inhibition of debonded glass ionomer sealants: an in vitro study.
    Smith NK; Morris KT; Wells M; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A
    Pediatr Dent; 2014; 36(7):464-7. PubMed ID: 25514073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Demineralization around orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and fluoride-releasing resin composite.
    Wilson RM; Donly KJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 11447960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. An in vitro investigation of marginal dentine caries abutting composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations.
    Knight GM; McIntyre JM; Craig GG; Mulyani ; Zilm PS; Gully NJ
    Aust Dent J; 2007 Sep; 52(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 17969286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Leakage patterns associated with glass-ionomer-based resin restorations.
    Wieczkowski G; Joynt RB; Davis EL; Yu XY; Cleary K
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 1437682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Inhibition of mineral loss at the enamel/sealant interface of fissures sealed with fluoride- and non-fluoride containing dental materials in vitro.
    Kantovitz KR; Pascon FM; Correr GM; Borges AF; Uchôa MN; Puppin-Rontani RM
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2006 Nov; 64(6):376-83. PubMed ID: 17123915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison between two glass-ionomer sealants placed using finger pressure (ART approach) and a ball burnisher.
    Beiruti N; Frencken JE; Mulder J
    Am J Dent; 2006 Jun; 19(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 16838480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. 2-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer sealant.
    Smales RJ; Wong KC
    Am J Dent; 1999 Apr; 12(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 10477983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Twenty-four month clinical evaluation of fissure sealants on partially erupted permanent first molars: glass ionomer versus resin-based sealant.
    Antonson SA; Antonson DE; Brener S; Crutchfield J; Larumbe J; Michaud C; Yazici AR; Hardigan PC; Alempour S; Evans D; Ocanto R
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Feb; 143(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 22298552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The effect of polishing systems on microleakage of tooth coloured restoratives: Part 1. Conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements.
    Yap AU; Tan S; Teh TY
    J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Feb; 27(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 10672147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Microleakage assessment of pit and fissure sealant with and without the use of pumice prophylaxis.
    Ansari G; Oloomi K; Eslami B
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2004 Jul; 14(4):272-8. PubMed ID: 15242384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.