These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21833560)
1. Endoscopic nasopharyngeal exploration at the end of conventional curettage adenoidectomy. Abdel-Aziz M Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Mar; 269(3):1037-40. PubMed ID: 21833560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How we do it: a combined method of traditional curette and power-assisted endoscopic adenoidectomy. Pagella F; Matti E; Colombo A; Giourgos G; Mira E Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 May; 129(5):556-9. PubMed ID: 18720070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Obstructive adenoid tissue: an indication for powered-shaver adenoidectomy. Havas T; Lowinger D Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2002 Jul; 128(7):789-91. PubMed ID: 12117336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study of two adenoidectomy technics for efficacy and safety: Conventional curettage adenoidectomy versus endoscopic microdebrider adenoidectomy. Yanılmaz M; Akduman D Am J Otolaryngol; 2023; 44(4):103807. PubMed ID: 36906963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role of endoscopic nasal examination in reduction of nasopharyngeal adenoid recurrence rates. Ezzat WF Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2010 Apr; 74(4):404-6. PubMed ID: 20163882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative analysis of conventional cold curettage versus endoscopic assisted coblation adenoidectomy. Bidaye R; Vaid N; Desarda K J Laryngol Otol; 2019 Apr; 133(4):294-299. PubMed ID: 30885281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bacteremia during adenoidectomy: a comparison of suction diathermy adenoid ablation and adenoid curettage. Casserly P; Kieran S; Phelan E; Smyth E; Lacy P Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2010 Aug; 119(8):526-9. PubMed ID: 20860277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of two different adenoidectomy techniques with special emphasize on postoperative nasal mucociliary clearance rates: coblation technique vs. cold curettage. Özkiriş M; Karaçavuş S; Kapusuz Z; Saydam L Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Mar; 77(3):389-93. PubMed ID: 23266160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tubal tonsil hypertrophy: a cause of recurrent symptoms after adenoidectomy. Emerick KS; Cunningham MJ Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Feb; 132(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 16490872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endoscopic-assisted versus curettage adenoidectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study with objective outcome measures. Songu M; Altay C; Adibelli ZH; Adibelli H Laryngoscope; 2010 Sep; 120(9):1895-9. PubMed ID: 20715086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of posterior choanal obstruction caused by adenoidal hypertrophy: Intra-operative mirror versus rigid nasendoscopic examination. Eweiss A; Al Yaghchi C; Sharma S; Wong PY Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jul; 110():144-146. PubMed ID: 29859577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The effect of adenoidectomy in different operative methods on the function of eustachian tube]. Li Y; Li P Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 May; 26(10):466-7. PubMed ID: 22870722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]