233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21833802)
1. Microwave ablation compared with radiofrequency ablation for breast tissue in an ex vivo bovine udder model.
Tanaka T; Westphal S; Isfort P; Braunschweig T; Penzkofer T; Bruners P; Kichikawa K; Schmitz-Rode T; Mahnken AH
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2012 Aug; 35(4):914-20. PubMed ID: 21833802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of microwave ablation and bipolar radiofrequency ablation both with an internally cooled probe: results in ex vivo and in vivo porcine livers.
Yu J; Liang P; Yu X; Liu F; Chen L; Wang Y
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Jul; 79(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 20047812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiofrequency ablation in breast tissue: experimental study for evaluation of radiofrequency effects in the bovine udder and review of the literature.
Stoeckelhuber BM; Noack F; Kapsimalakou S; Rudolf I; Bergmann-Koester CU; Helmberger T; Stoeckelhuber M
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1477-82. PubMed ID: 19875066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multipolar radiofrequency ablation with internally cooled electrodes: experimental study in ex vivo bovine liver with mathematic modeling.
Clasen S; Schmidt D; Boss A; Dietz K; Kröber SM; Claussen CD; Pereira PL
Radiology; 2006 Mar; 238(3):881-90. PubMed ID: 16424244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High-powered microwave ablation with a small-gauge, gas-cooled antenna: initial ex vivo and in vivo results.
Lubner MG; Hinshaw JL; Andreano A; Sampson L; Lee FT; Brace CL
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2012 Mar; 23(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 22277272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Internally gas-cooled radiofrequency applicators as an alternative to conventional radiofrequency and microwave ablation devices: an in vivo comparison.
Rempp H; Voigtländer M; Schenk M; Enderle MD; Scharpf M; Greiner TO; Neugebauer A; Hoffmann R; Claussen CD; Clasen S
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):e350-5. PubMed ID: 23522746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High-power generator for radiofrequency ablation: larger electrodes and pulsing algorithms in bovine ex vivo and porcine in vivo settings.
Solazzo SA; Ahmed M; Liu Z; Hines-Peralta AU; Goldberg SN
Radiology; 2007 Mar; 242(3):743-50. PubMed ID: 17244719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of variation of portal venous blood flow on radiofrequency and microwave ablations in a blood-perfused bovine liver model.
Dodd GD; Dodd NA; Lanctot AC; Glueck DA
Radiology; 2013 Apr; 267(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 23297326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hybrid radiofrequency and cryoablation device: preliminary results in an animal model.
Hines-Peralta A; Hollander CY; Solazzo S; Horkan C; Liu ZJ; Goldberg SN
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Oct; 15(10):1111-20. PubMed ID: 15466798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Increased ablation zones using a cryo-based internally cooled bipolar RF applicator in ex vivo bovine liver.
Rempp H; Voigtländer M; Clasen S; Kempf S; Neugebauer A; Schraml C; Schmidt D; Claussen CD; Enderle MD; Goldberg SN; Pereira PL
Invest Radiol; 2009 Dec; 44(12):763-8. PubMed ID: 19838120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. FEM analysis of RF breast ablation: multiprobe versus cool-tip electrode.
Quaranta V; Manenti G; Bolacchi F; Cossu E; Pistolese CA; Buonomo OC; Carotenuto L; Piconi C; Simonetti G
Anticancer Res; 2007; 27(2):775-84. PubMed ID: 17465202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Switching monopolar radiofrequency ablation technique using multiple, internally cooled electrodes and a multichannel generator: ex vivo and in vivo pilot study.
Lee JM; Han JK; Kim HC; Choi YH; Kim SH; Choi JY; Choi BI
Invest Radiol; 2007 Mar; 42(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 17287646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiofrequency ablation zones in ex vivo bovine and in vivo porcine livers: comparison of the use of internally cooled electrodes and internally cooled wet electrodes.
Cha J; Choi D; Lee MW; Rhim H; Kim YS; Lim HK; Yoon JH; Park CK
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2009 Nov; 32(6):1235-40. PubMed ID: 19488818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microwave ablation: results with a 2.45-GHz applicator in ex vivo bovine and in vivo porcine liver.
Hines-Peralta AU; Pirani N; Clegg P; Cronin N; Ryan TP; Liu Z; Goldberg SN
Radiology; 2006 Apr; 239(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 16484351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 915MHz microwave ablation with high output power in in vivo porcine spleens.
Gao Y; Wang Y; Duan Y; Li C; Sun Y; Zhang D; Lu T; Liang P
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 19349134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiofrequency versus microwave ablation in a hepatic porcine model.
Wright AS; Sampson LA; Warner TF; Mahvi DM; Lee FT
Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):132-9. PubMed ID: 15987969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bipolar radiofrequency ablation: is the shape of the coagulation volume different in comparison to monopolar RF-ablation using variable active tip lengths?
Bruners P; Lipka J; Günther RW; Schmitz-Rode T; Mahnken AH
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2008; 17(5):267-74. PubMed ID: 18855208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wet radio-frequency ablation using multiple electrodes: comparative study of bipolar versus monopolar modes in the bovine liver.
Lee JM; Han JK; Kim SH; Han CJ; An SK; Lee JY; Choi BI
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):408-17. PubMed ID: 15899344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microwave ablation: results with double 915 MHz antennae in ex vivo bovine livers.
Shi W; Liang P; Zhu Q; Yu X; Shao Q; Lu T; Wang Y; Dong B
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 20395095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of renal ablation with monopolar radiofrequency and hypertonic-saline-augmented bipolar radiofrequency: in vitro and in vivo experimental studies.
Lee JM; Han JK; Choi SH; Kim SH; Lee JY; Shin KS; Han CJ; Choi BI
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Mar; 184(3):897-905. PubMed ID: 15728615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
