These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21834393)

  • 21. Comparison of male and female foot shape.
    Luo G; Houston VL; Mussman M; Garbarini M; Beattie AC; Thongpop C
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2009; 99(5):383-90. PubMed ID: 19767544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22.
    Rafiq RB; Hoque KM; Kabir MA; Ahmed S; Laird C
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 22(23):. PubMed ID: 36502254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The relationship between foot pain, anthropometric variables and footwear among older people.
    Paiva de Castro A; Rebelatto JR; Aurichio TR
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jan; 41(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 19497557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sex-related differences in foot shape of adult Caucasians--a follow-up study focusing on long and short feet.
    Krauss I; Langbein C; Horstmann T; Grau S
    Ergonomics; 2011 Mar; 54(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 21390959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A new approach to children's footwear based on foot type classification.
    Mauch M; Grau S; Krauss I; Maiwald C; Horstmann T
    Ergonomics; 2009 Aug; 52(8):999-1008. PubMed ID: 19629814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Footwear fit in schoolchildren of southern Spain: a population study.
    González Elena ML; Córdoba-Fernández A
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 May; 20(1):208. PubMed ID: 31077163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Foot deformation during walking: differences between static and dynamic 3D foot morphology in developing feet.
    Barisch-Fritz B; Schmeltzpfenning T; Plank C; Grau S
    Ergonomics; 2014; 57(6):921-33. PubMed ID: 24684680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An examination of the relationship between foot length, foot breath, ball girth, height and weight of Turkish university students aged between 17 and 25.
    Anil A; Peker T; Turgut HB; Ulukent SC
    Anthropol Anz; 1997 Mar; 55(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 9161684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Injury-reduction effectiveness of prescribing running shoes on the basis of foot arch height: summary of military investigations.
    Knapik JJ; Trone DW; Tchandja J; Jones BH
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2014 Oct; 44(10):805-12. PubMed ID: 25155917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Impact of footwear fitting on foot shape in primary schoolgirls.
    Puszczałowska-Lizis E; Zarzyczna P; Mikuľáková W
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2020; 22(1):119-126. PubMed ID: 32307463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Footwear characteristics and foot problems in older people.
    Menz HB; Morris ME
    Gerontology; 2005; 51(5):346-51. PubMed ID: 16110238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. 3D laser measurements of bare and shod feet during walking.
    Novak B; Možina J; Jezeršek M
    Gait Posture; 2014; 40(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 24661899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. COMPARING 3D FOOT SHAPE MODELS BETWEEN TAIWANESE AND JAPANESE FEMALES.
    Lee YC; Kouchi M; Mochimaru M; Wang MJ
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 2015 Jun; 44(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 27281917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Foot landmarking for footwear customization.
    Luximon A; Goonetilleke RS; Tsui KL
    Ergonomics; 2003 Mar; 46(4):364-83. PubMed ID: 12637176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Injury reduction effectiveness of assigning running shoes based on plantar shape in Marine Corps basic training.
    Knapik JJ; Trone DW; Swedler DI; Villasenor A; Bullock SH; Schmied E; Bockelman T; Han P; Jones BH
    Am J Sports Med; 2010 Sep; 38(9):1759-67. PubMed ID: 20576837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Do patients with diabetes wear shoes of the correct size?
    Harrison SJ; Cochrane L; Abboud RJ; Leese GP
    Int J Clin Pract; 2007 Nov; 61(11):1900-4. PubMed ID: 17935549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Do the feet of German and Australian children differ in structure? Implications for children's shoe design.
    Mauch M; Mickle KJ; Munro BJ; Dowling AM; Grau S; Steele JR
    Ergonomics; 2008 Apr; 51(4):527-39. PubMed ID: 18357539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Foot measurement for shoe construction with reference to the relationship between foot length, foot breadth, and ball girth.
    Baba K
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1974 Dec; 3(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 4465404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. How to measure children's feet: 3D foot scanning compared with established 2D manual or digital methods.
    Mueller J; Richter M; Schaefer K; Ganz J; Lohscheller J; Mueller S
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2023 Apr; 16(1):21. PubMed ID: 37061747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sex differences in relative foot length and perceived attractiveness of female feet: relationships among anthropometry, physique, and preference ratings.
    Voracek M; Fisher ML; Rupp B; Lucas D; Fessler DM
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Jun; 104(3 Pt 2):1123-38. PubMed ID: 17879647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.