These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21837548)

  • 1. Faculty development on item writing substantially improves item quality.
    Naeem N; van der Vleuten C; Alfaris EA
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2012 Aug; 17(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 21837548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Will a Short Training Session Improve Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Quality by Dental School Faculty? A Pilot Study.
    Dellinges MA; Curtis DA
    J Dent Educ; 2017 Aug; 81(8):948-955. PubMed ID: 28765439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A One-Day Dental Faculty Workshop in Writing Multiple-Choice Questions: An Impact Evaluation.
    AlFaris E; Naeem N; Irfan F; Qureshi R; Saad H; Al Sadhan R; Abdulghani HM; Van der Vleuten C
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Nov; 79(11):1305-13. PubMed ID: 26522635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The frequency of item writing flaws in multiple-choice questions used in high stakes nursing assessments.
    Tarrant M; Knierim A; Hayes SK; Ware J
    Nurse Educ Today; 2006 Dec; 26(8):662-71. PubMed ID: 17014932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of a longitudinal faculty development program on the quality of multiple-choice question item writing in medical education.
    Owolabi LF; Adamu B; Taura MG; Isa AI; Jibo AM; Abdul-Razek R; Alharthi MM; Alghamdi M
    Ann Afr Med; 2021; 20(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 33727512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness of longitudinal faculty development programs on MCQs items writing skills: A follow-up study.
    Abdulghani HM; Irshad M; Haque S; Ahmad T; Sattar K; Khalil MS
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185895. PubMed ID: 29016659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education.
    Downing SM
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2005; 10(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 16078098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are faculty predictions or item taxonomies useful for estimating the outcome of multiple-choice examinations?
    Kibble JD; Johnson T
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2011 Dec; 35(4):396-401. PubMed ID: 22139777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinically discriminating checklists versus thoroughness checklists: improving the validity of performance test scores.
    Yudkowsky R; Park YS; Riddle J; Palladino C; Bordage G
    Acad Med; 2014 Jul; 89(7):1057-62. PubMed ID: 24685660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Faculty member review and feedback using a sign-out checklist: improving intern written sign-out.
    Bump GM; Bost JE; Buranosky R; Elnicki M
    Acad Med; 2012 Aug; 87(8):1125-31. PubMed ID: 22722359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Writing Multiple Choice Questions-Has the Student Become the Master?
    Pham H; Court-Kowalski S; Chan H; Devitt P
    Teach Learn Med; 2023; 35(3):356-367. PubMed ID: 35491868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality assurance of item writing: during the introduction of multiple choice questions in medicine for high stakes examinations.
    Ware J; Vik T
    Med Teach; 2009 Mar; 31(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 18825568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A good clinician and a caring person: longitudinal faculty development and the enhancement of the human dimensions of care.
    Branch WT; Frankel R; Gracey CF; Haidet PM; Weissmann PF; Cantey P; Mitchell GA; Inui TS
    Acad Med; 2009 Jan; 84(1):117-25. PubMed ID: 19116489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the impact of faculty development programme initiative: Are we really improving skills in MCQ writing?
    Kiran F; Ayub R; Rauf A; Qamar K
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2021 Oct; 71(10):2434-2438. PubMed ID: 34974586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Creating an objective structured teaching examination to evaluate a dental faculty development program.
    McAndrew M; Eidtson WH; Pierre GC; Gillespie CC
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):461-71. PubMed ID: 22473558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Education techniques for lifelong learning: writing multiple-choice questions for continuing medical education activities and self-assessment modules.
    Collins J
    Radiographics; 2006; 26(2):543-51. PubMed ID: 16549616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of item-writing flaws in multiple-choice questions.
    Nedeau-Cayo R; Laughlin D; Rus L; Hall J
    J Nurses Prof Dev; 2013; 29(2):52-7; quiz E1-2. PubMed ID: 23657034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Role of Faculty Development in Improving the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions in Dental Education.
    Shaikh S; Kannan SK; Naqvi ZA; Pasha Z; Ahamad M
    J Dent Educ; 2020 Mar; 84(3):316-322. PubMed ID: 32176343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of an objective structured teaching evaluation on faculty teaching skills.
    Julian K; Appelle N; O'Sullivan P; Morrison EH; Wamsley M
    Teach Learn Med; 2012; 24(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 22250929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the quality of clinical teaching: a preliminary study.
    Conigliaro RL; Stratton TD
    Med Educ; 2010 Apr; 44(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 20444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.